This Wednesday,
Feb. 11, at 3:15 p.m., Portland City Parks Commissioner Amanda Fritz will
introduce an ordinance to impose a smoking ban and tobacco-free policy in all
city parks, recreation areas, and any other places where the Portland Parks
& Recreation Bureau has jurisdiction. I plan to be there to observe and, I
hope, testify in support.
The ban has been
brewing for a while. The proposal surfaced last May, and the Oregonian editorial page came out in
opposition. I sent a lengthy letter to the editor in response, which the paper
put on its website and in the print edition as a “guest commentary” with a
rebuttal from the editor. This is a rare occurrence, so as I observed on this blog, I must have hit the guy where he lives.
In preparation
for this month’s formal proposal by Fritz, her office invited public comment in
January. Here the letter I emailed to her assistant:
I am voicing my strong support for the proposed smoking ban in Portland parks.
My wife and I
have lived at Museum Place, 1030 SW Jefferson, for nearly a decade. We
patronize the symphony, the art museum, the PSU farmers market, and other
facilities and events along and within the South Park Blocks on a regular
basis. We walk our dog (and pick up after her) every day there.
We belong to
the Friends of South Park Blocks, and as volunteers over the past three years
have collected trash (which invariably includes hundreds of cigarette butts),
weeded, mulched, and deadheaded the rose beds between the art museum and the
historical society, and raised financing for and planted new plants along the Lincoln
block between SW Madison and Main.
In addition, I
work part-time for the Portland Streetcar as a customer service rep, and lead
Portland Walking Tours every week. The latter bring visitors to Portland from
all over the nation and indeed the world, and the tour route traverses two
blocks of the South Park Blocks -- as well as Chapman Square, Lownsdale Square,
and Tom McCall Waterfront Park, where my guests see some of the same problems
that give our city a black eye.
We need a
smoking ban because the South Park Blocks have become dangerous to citizens and
an eyesore. Drug dealers hang out nearly all day, every day, on the Shemanski
Park block between SW Salmon and Main. Skateboarders brazenly leap on the
“Peace Chant” sculpture at all hours of the day, despite signage that bans
skateboards in the park blocks entirely and in particular in Peace Chant Square. Vagrants eat, sleep, beg, and even defecate (as well as allow their
dogs to do so) on the park blocks, despite the presence of a Portland Loo on SW
Columbia.
Many of these
people smoke. No doubt many of them dump their cigarette butts on the grass,
walks, and street, rather than use the plentiful trash barrels. But not only
they do it; I see respectable-looking passersby and residents of the adjacent
apartments and condos dump their cigarettes on the streets and in the park as
well. Smokers of all walks of life seem to assume littering laws do not apply
to them.
All of this
has contributed to a general degradation of the neighborhood. At present, neither
the Park Rangers, Portland Clean and Safe, the private Pacific Patrol officers,
nor Portland Police have any enforcement power over this noisome problem. Nor,
I would agree, should they, if we were speaking of smoking in and of itself.
Littering and second-hand smoke inarguably pale in comparison to the car
break-ins, public drunkenness, and violent crimes that occur in the downtown
core.
But a smoking
ban would give authorities more leverage over the people who tend to commit
these crimes, and would, I hope, raise the level of patrolling in the park
areas where trouble often occurs. This would be a great thing, given the
considerable tourist traffic, not to mention the regular crowds of children who
flow through the South Park Blocks on visits to the Art Museum, the Historical
Society, and productions of the Oregon Children's Theater in the performing
arts center.
The examples
of the bans in Pioneer Courthouse Square and Director Park should indicate the
advantages to be enjoyed. People love to spend time in those spaces, and the
same should be true of the parks. I have repeatedly had confrontations with
skateboarders at the Peace Chant statue, many of whom have grown increasingly
belligerent because they know the authorities won’t show up in time to throw
them out or impose sanctions. I don't dare confront the drug dealers, vagrants,
or crazy people who wander the park.
It feels like
a war, and many of us are feeling like giving up. Starting with the Downtown
Plan in the early 1970s, the city did wonderful things to battle suburban
flight and attract citizens back into the downtown core to live. But too often,
the council seems unaware that 12,000 of us live in the downtown area, pay
taxes, contribute to the life of the city, and yet have to battle the litter,
abuse, trash, cigarette butts, excrement, and daily begging of people the city
can’t or won’t do anything about.
You’re losing
us, in spirit and, more and more likely, in body as well.
Please pass the
parks smoking ban.
Although the Oregonian editorialist attacked the proposed ordinance again last December on the basis of freedom of choice for
smokers as well as the need to “keep Portland weird,” a pair of current or
recent Portland Parks board members fired back. And across the rest of the
country, change is looking inevitable.
Nearly 500 U.S. cities, counties, and towns have already banned smoking in public parks. It’s
probably no surprise that Salt Lake City is one of them. San Francisco enacted
a ban ’way back in 2004 that’s still one of the strictest in the country.
Chicago banned
smoking on public playgrounds and beaches (including 26 miles of Lake Michigan
lakefront) in 2007. In the same year, the mayor of Albuquerque enacted a ban by
executive order, and though the city council opposed the order and called it
“unenforceable,” it remains in effect.
Los Angeles
County passed its smoking ban in 2009. The only exceptions are actors on films
sets and in theatrical productions, and then only in consultation with a fire
official and at the discretion of the parks director.
Whether in acknowledgement that it’s kind of hypocritical for a pharmacy and health-care products retailer to sell addictive drugs that damage the respiratory tract, or just a corporate response to what appears to be an ever-dwindling market, that’s a heartening development.
No comments:
Post a Comment