Quantcast

Friday, June 11, 2010

The Curse of the Spectating Class - David Loftus

As I write this -- the morning of Friday, June 11 -- a little boy has been missing in the Portland, Oregon area for seven days. Not an unusual occurrence, sad to say, and it’s not surprising that Kyron Horman’s disappearance has dominated the local news for the past week. What is unusual is that the seven-year-old second grader disappeared without a trace from inside his elementary school on a crowded public day, and the story has made the national news.

The sweet, shy little boy, whose stepmother brought him to Skyline Elementary on the morning of Friday, June 4 with a display about red-eyed tree frogs he made for the school’s science fair, was last seen at 9 a.m. when she dropped him off. When he did not come home on the school bus at 4 p.m., she called the school.

Portland Police were notified shortly thereafter. By 9:45 p.m., about 20 searchers were combing the area around the school (located in a rural, forested area in the hills just west of downtown Portland). More than 100 volunteers were searching the next day, and the FBI was called in toward the end of the second day. Eventually, Facebook pages and new Web sites buzzed with breaking news and proposals to help, the local sheriff was being interviewed by Matt Lauer on the “Today” show, and I saw the story linked from the news feed on my Earthlink account by the middle of this week.

I won’t rehearse the many other details, which you may Google yourself. I don’t have any particular connection to the case: I have no children, and I don’t know any of the principals -- although I do know where Skyline Elementary is (about 2 miles west of where I sit typing this) because I performed there with my English morris folk dance team one sunny May Day morning more than a decade ago.

What inspires me to comment is some of the local reaction to the developing story, as embodied in the comments to each new story on the local paper’s Web site. You are probably familiar with the abusive, name-calling, overly personal and inflammatory comments that follow many news reports on almost any American newspaper’s Web site. They typically turn a local news story into an illustration of some political, ideological point, or make something personal about every national news story and any other comments made about it.

This is the sort of thing we Internet surfers used to see only on Usenet (in the mid 1990s) and then on various fan blogs (after the turn of the millennium). Now it has spread to more public forums, where it naturally shocks newcomers and the general public (not to mention established writers who have not been longtime Web surfers).

Leonard Pitts, the estimable columnist for the Miami Herald, published a piece on March 31 about how anonymity protects posters and probably encourages them to be disrespectful and abusive. His column ran in our paper that same day. Comments in my local paper immediately proceeded to prove his point. Pitts is an excellent, thoughtful writer, but conservative readers in Portland manage to find something “racist” (Pitts is African-American) about nearly every one of his pieces. (Having hunted down the column in Pitts’s home paper, I note that the general quality of comments in response to the piece there is not as bad as it was here -- perhaps because Pitts is local and readers are used to seeing him as a real person and a “neighbor.”)

In the case of little Kyron Horman, some comments immediately guessed at the possible guilty party. They accused the stepmother of kidnapping her own son, wondered whether his birth mom (divorced from father and living down state) might be to blame, suggested the stepmother’s 16-year-old son from a previous marriage might have done something sinister (he was actually on a Boy Scout camping trip with his father that weekend), blamed the school for not having security cameras operating all over the building, demanded other policies and practices on the part of the school district, and so on.

As the days have passed and the story plays out, strangers have found fault with various parents’ behavior (why aren’t they out searching night and day? … why have they not made more public comment? … why did the stepmother blithely report on her Facebook page that she was going to the club to work out that night? … etc.).

Clearly, it is a matter for suspicion that the boy disappeared from a public but fairly closed facility, which suggests he left with someone he trusts. Each day that passes and he is not found fallen in a hole, trapped in a custodial closet, or maimed or electrocuted, increases the likelihood he was indeed abducted, and by someone he knew.

But why can’t people restrain the urge to toss out hurtful theories and lay blame in public when a family is suffering over the disappearance of their beloved child? Citizens who have no connection to the case are treating it as if it were an episode of “Law and Order” or “Without a Trace” (a widely circulated photo taken of the boy the morning of his disappearance unfortunately shows him wearing a “CSI” tee shirt!); in other words, it’s just another piece of entertainment for them.

Too many Americans treat almost everything, even their own lives, as if it were a show. This reaches its deplorable zenith with the war(s), wherein citizens both thrill to and jeer news reports of complicated and deadly developments as if they were no more than points scored in an athletic contest (and a badly umpired one, too), and then lose interest and stop caring what their government does, largely because the “show” has become repetitive and boring. (Meanwhile hundreds of young American boys and girls, and thousands of Iraqi and Afghan civilians, continue to die and suffer loss of health and limbs for no damn good reason!)


This is not a game show. It is not an entertainment. It is reality -- yours and those of other human beings who happen to be caught at a particularly vulnerable time of their lives. They are not actors or politicians accustomed to being questioned, judged, evaluated, pilloried, or even just noticed in public, by the media, in front of their neighbors. So stop treating them like fictional characters, and quit behaving like this is a piece of entertainment. Learn to reserve judgment; wait for better information; keep your nose out of matters that don't personally concern you and your loved ones.


Otherwise you're just indulging in public gossip and bullying.

13 comments:

  1. Perfectly written!

    I am one of those who has been tirelessly asking others why they feel they must point fingers at his mom (stepmother). The main focus needs to be on finding this young boy first then move onto what happened, why and who is responsible.

    My hat is off to you!
    Mazama

    ReplyDelete
  2. AMEN I also have been trying to understand why people are so "obsessed" on trying to prove who did it. Just help find that baby boy!!! And as Mazama said then and only then should we point fingers!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  3. AnonymousJune 11, 2010

    I agree 100% - Very well written. Post consider sending this to the Oregonian as a "Letter to the Editor".

    ReplyDelete
  4. Thank you David,
    You have captured a lot of my thoughts. People do mean well, but, have no clue what is/is not being investigated. They have no idea what its like for these families to have a houseful of detectives for a week straight grilling them & watching their every move, then, to have these strangers casting stones at them. Everyone would have a different reaction to the person next to them. Who is to say how one should "act" when your kid is missing? add to that the scrutiny from thousands of strangers. Damn. Me? I would lay low too!

    I have been watching the internet armchair detectives all gripping to the real life soap opera playing out for them. Entertaining? Not to me, it makes me angry. Its easy to sit at your computer and say how you'd do it better than they did. Makes me wonder, why aren't all these "helpful" know-it-alls gathering their own groups to search Forest Park or other places that they all mention that are not part of the search? Why aren't they beating feet passing out fliers? They "say" they want to help and "talk" about it so much. Instead, they are glued to their cyberworld waiting for every news tidbit that mentions Kyron's name.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Excellent and very well written article! I applaud you for putting into words what many feel.

    ReplyDelete
  6. AnonymousJune 11, 2010

    This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Thank you for venting my frustrations. I can't imagine how all these people who criticize the Hormans know how they'd (re)act if their child were missing, as though there should be a script for the moment. The priority is to find the boy. There will be a time when all the armchair detectives can point there fingers - but that time is not now.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Thank you for your comments, everyone. I've been repeatedly angered and frustrated by the nasty, small-minded, and disrespectful comments that festoon most news stories I see on most newspaper Web sites; of late I've even commented on OregonLive.com a number of times, myself, in an attempt to maintain a voice of reason . . . but this one takes the cake!

    I don't think a lot of these people stop to think about how things might be if they were in the Horman family's shoes, because they don't think about how much of ANYTHING they do -- whether it's driving while talking on a cell phone, dropping cigarette butts on the street, not picking up after their dog poops in the park, stopping to chat with friends in the middle of the sidewalk -- affects others.

    Everything outside their door is just one big Disney World of stuff for them to look at, enjoy, or judge, and they are outside of it.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Thanks, David, for this thoughtful piece. I, too, despair as I read the comments from "anonymous" as they castigate, spew venom and point fingers at people they do not know, situations they do not understand, and institutions they have never entered.
    Sometimes I think Alexander Hamilton was right.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Well said, David.

    I don't know if people really are more voyeuristic, vicious, and vile than they were before the Internet, or if the Internet simply allows them broader voice. Regardless, it's not a voice I care to hear.

    Keep up the good work.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Thank you!!!

    I rarely read the Oregonian online or most any online news due to commentators which is usually nothing but hatred and vile.

    My nephew was killed in a car crash in New England. Loved ones near and far used the online paper as a means of getting up to the minute info on the accident as well as funeral and memorial information. Why? Because our family was in such grief and chaos we didn't want to bog down their phone lines.

    You wouldn't believe the hate-filled, accusatory comments. The basic comment was that the three boys "deserved" to die because it was assumed even though the article and the police immediately ruled out drugs or alcohol, but it was assumed that all young boys drive reckless and on drugs.

    One poster even commented that the parents were to blame because they were out at 10pm. They all worked at the same job and were on their way home before curfew.

    People weighed in, anonymously, as judge, jury and executioner.

    My nephew and two others classmates who would have graduated today, all died because a deer jumped out into their path.

    We will never get over the loss of Alex. And we found out exactly what society has become.

    Sad news like this is nothing but infotainment for the masses.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Martin -- I tend not to presume that people are necessarily better or worse than they used to be. What is different now is that the Internet (and the attendant ability to communicate anonymously with hundreds, thousands, even millions) has brought to light: 1) the seamy underside of people who are otherwise too cowardly or polite to be honest about their nastier thoughts in public, and 2) a public forum for folks who used to stay silently, brooding, resentful, but unheard and unknown, in their rooms.

    ReplyDelete
  13. AnonymousJune 12, 2010

    This is well said...

    I myself am young. I have an 8 year old stepdaughter, and a newborn daughter as well. I shudder to think that for the majority of the past year, I have been dropping my stepdaughter off at school as her father had to be at work very early. How easily could it have been me who dropped her off, and the same thing could happen to her?!? To know that immediately society would point the finger at me as sinister stepmother who cared nothing for the child is absurd! I cannot imagine the pain this family is going through, and send all my prayers for the safe finding of this little boy.

    The sad shame of it is, you're right. This is just entertainment for the mindless masses. They are sheep following the precedence of 'blame the parents' propaganda that are shoved in their faces with every missing child case for the past several decades. Look at what happened with poor JonBenet Ramsey! And to this day, people still believe that her parents chopped her up and buried her in the basement! Not to say that I know whether they did or not, but an executive and judicial system was put in place in our goverment to hail over these situations. And we the public claim we know it all because it was made into a Lifetime Movie. I shake my head at you senseless traditionalists. If you really feel the need to say something, send along your sincerest condolences to the family, say a prayer to whatever deity in whatever religion you believe in, and go on about your day.

    ReplyDelete