This was a good example of why we have the right to bear arms. If Riley had been explaining himself, we may raise a bit of an eyebrow and say, "Maybe he shouldn't have been shot...." However, he threw a chair through the window. Classic burglar move. In the call, he's clearly terrorizing her, and it's clear that she didn't want to kill him and felt sorry for being forced to do so. At no point in her story or the call do I think she was acting out of line or taking advantage of the right to bear arms.
However, the right to bear arms isn't always so effective. It's easy to abuse. The good old boy with a pistol in his truck when he leaves the water hole is not so effective. Drug dealers and gangs, who don't always follow the proper steps to attain a firearm, deal with a lot of violence as a result of weaponry. Someone with a concealed weapon is making a poor choice. Jackson was in "the safety of her own home," and defended herself against someone attacking that safety. Quite a difference to having a gun in the parking lot of a bar.
So maybe the screening process should be a little different. If you're a woman who spends time alone, here's your gun. If you pull up to the rifle store with a gun-rack on your truck, maybe we ought to have a bit longer of a waiting period. Or maybe certain people just borrow guns during hunting season and then return them. We'll see how the crime rate changes due to deer. Arguing for Riley would be tough. There's a reason no charges were filed.
Email Shaun
Friday, December 11, 2009
Bearing Arms: Austin Lee
We will never know what might have happened to Donna Jackson had she not owned a gun or not been allowed to have a gun in her home. Thankfully, she had a gun, knew how to use it, and was not afraid to take action when she felt her life was in danger. This is exactly why the Second Amendment is important. She did not use deadly force as a first action, she called 911 to ask for police assistance. When Billy Dean Riley threw a chair through the window to gain access to her home, she feared for her life and used her weapon to defend her home and her person.
I would have taken the same action as Ms. Jackson. I would have told the 911 operator that I was armed and that if I felt threatened that I would use deadly force. I would have said to the intruder in a cool calm voice, "I am armed. If you open the door I will shoot you with the intent to kill you." When he threw the chair through the window I would have cocked the hammer back, and killed that sorry piece of crap. Then I would have told the police scrape that junk off my porch and I would have had a good nights sleep.
What would a liberal gun control wacko do? They would call 911 and tell the operator that someone was trying to break in. Then they would say, "Stop right there. Don't take another step. I have called the police. You just stay there, Mr. Drunk man that threw a chair through my window and is coming at me. The police are coming, I bet you will be sorry when they get here. I mean it, mister. You are in big trouble." They would probably have trouble sleeping for months.
Email Austin
I would have taken the same action as Ms. Jackson. I would have told the 911 operator that I was armed and that if I felt threatened that I would use deadly force. I would have said to the intruder in a cool calm voice, "I am armed. If you open the door I will shoot you with the intent to kill you." When he threw the chair through the window I would have cocked the hammer back, and killed that sorry piece of crap. Then I would have told the police scrape that junk off my porch and I would have had a good nights sleep.
What would a liberal gun control wacko do? They would call 911 and tell the operator that someone was trying to break in. Then they would say, "Stop right there. Don't take another step. I have called the police. You just stay there, Mr. Drunk man that threw a chair through my window and is coming at me. The police are coming, I bet you will be sorry when they get here. I mean it, mister. You are in big trouble." They would probably have trouble sleeping for months.
Email Austin
Bearing Arms: Have Your Say
Now that you've read what our panel thought on this subject, have your say by leaving a comment.
Thursday, December 10, 2009
Sexting Tragedy
When Jessica complained to school officials about students sending her nude photo to each other, she was referred to a police officer, who in turn told her he could only encourage students to delete her photo from their phones, but could not open a criminal investigation because she was not a minor. The police officer, Paul Payne, instead encouraged Jessica to agree to be interviewed by a local television news reporter who was doing a story on “sexting” - the act of sending nude or sexually graphic images via cell phone. Jessica agreed to discuss her situation on television with her face and voice altered to protect her identity.
After students realized Jessica had reported them to the authorities, she began being harassed with threatening phone calls and text messages, and she was labeled a “whore” and a “skank.” Her grades and attendance suffered, and Jessica almost failed to graduate from high school. Jessica managed to complete her assignments and attend her high school graduation – where she was pelted with objects by other students during the ceremony. The harassment continued after graduation and on July 3, 2008 after attending the funeral of a friend who had committed suicide, Jessica Logan – the only child of Albert and Cynthia Logan - hung herself.
Now, the Logans are suing Ryan Salyers and four of Jessica's former classmates for severe infliction of emotional distress, as well as suing the Sycamore Community School Board of Education and police officer Paul Payne for severe, pervasive, and objectively offensive harassment, and for violating Jessica's Fourteenth Amendment rights of equal protection and due process of law.
Today Art, Shaun, Jamie, and Sasha offer their opinions on where the responsibility should lie. After reading where they stand on the issue, join the conversation by leaving a comment.
Sexting Tragedy: David Loftus
The Logan-Salyers story is such a tragic and stupid -- a stupidly tragic – story. There are so many pieces, so many contributing factors, to a mess like this one, that one hardly knows where to begin. Do I think a school board or the police should (or even could) control what students send on their cell phones; or that this particular school board and police agency were negligent; or that parents should monitor what their children send on their cell phones? Probably not, in all cases. But then, I don’t think teens should have cell phones. If they can’t pay for it, then there’s no reason to have one, any more than a car of their “own” (which their parents bought for them).
Jessica Logan was a victim of her peers’ bullying and insensitivity, certainly, but it might not have resulted in her suicide if they hadn’t all had access to such casually powerful technology -- to be able to shoot nude photos of oneself or friends with a hand-held phone and distribute them by electronic mail, to send and receive text messages, and so on. Combined with teenagers’ lack of perspective, and imperfect grasp of the consequences of their actions, modern technological toys are only a little less dangerous than loaded guns.
But it’s not just these kids who made poor choices. I maintain that such deaths are innocent sacrifices to a larger “grown-up” culture of manic production-and-consumption. Parents who both have to work full-time (whether because the economic system has evolved to the point of making single-wage-earner households so much less possible, or because parents force themselves into this rut by living far beyond their means), end up subordinating their neglected kids’ happiness and safety to their own long hours and debts. They can’t be there to love, instruct, and protect their children from their own deadly innocence and the nastier world outside. But then, what do I know? I had a father who was home for part of the day as well as a mother; my parents wouldn’t allow a television in the house; they forced or bribed me to learn violin and run long distance; I despised automobiles as a teen and chose not to learn to drive, obtain a license, or buy a car until I was 27; I did not possess a credit card until I was nearly 40 (and I maintain a zero balance from month to month today). Clearly, I am not on the program . . . and am curiously happy and healthy in spite of that.
Jessica Logan was a victim of her peers’ bullying and insensitivity, certainly, but it might not have resulted in her suicide if they hadn’t all had access to such casually powerful technology -- to be able to shoot nude photos of oneself or friends with a hand-held phone and distribute them by electronic mail, to send and receive text messages, and so on. Combined with teenagers’ lack of perspective, and imperfect grasp of the consequences of their actions, modern technological toys are only a little less dangerous than loaded guns.
But it’s not just these kids who made poor choices. I maintain that such deaths are innocent sacrifices to a larger “grown-up” culture of manic production-and-consumption. Parents who both have to work full-time (whether because the economic system has evolved to the point of making single-wage-earner households so much less possible, or because parents force themselves into this rut by living far beyond their means), end up subordinating their neglected kids’ happiness and safety to their own long hours and debts. They can’t be there to love, instruct, and protect their children from their own deadly innocence and the nastier world outside. But then, what do I know? I had a father who was home for part of the day as well as a mother; my parents wouldn’t allow a television in the house; they forced or bribed me to learn violin and run long distance; I despised automobiles as a teen and chose not to learn to drive, obtain a license, or buy a car until I was 27; I did not possess a credit card until I was nearly 40 (and I maintain a zero balance from month to month today). Clearly, I am not on the program . . . and am curiously happy and healthy in spite of that.
Sexting Tragedy: Shaun Hautly
While suicide is a sobering fact in this story, it's also not something she was forced to do. If she had been murdered as a hate crime, this would be much different. However, she wasn't, nor was she forced to take the picture, send it, or even date this dude. These were all choices that she made. If she had walked into an all black school and said something racist, she should expect to be treated with hostility. The same rules apply when you take something risque and give it to high-schoolers (or adults, really). As Dave Barry said, there is no more destructible force in this world than gossip. Well, it gets even worse when there are pictures to back up the rumors.
The one point I agree on is that to some small degree, the school board is at fault. ONLY in that students were throwing things at her during graduation. Students bullying other students in the presence of officials shouldn't be tolerated. The rest of it though, as cold as this sounds, she deserved. Yes they're young and stupid, but that doesn't un-impregnate a sexually active teen. That doesn't un-kill students in a drunk driving accident. And it certainly doesn't un-text naked pictures you send to someone VOLUNTARILY.
This is just another reminder to people that we share information quickly these days. This isn't something where you have to make photocopies and distribute them, this is where you click "forward" and get on with your life. If you're going to send those pictures, crop 'em better, download some from the internet and say that it's you in the pic. Teens commit suicide all the time, and many of them for things they didn't start. Maybe we should be more worried about them. Again, my heart goes out to people who lose someone, but lets just own up to our own mistakes from now on.
Email Shaun
The one point I agree on is that to some small degree, the school board is at fault. ONLY in that students were throwing things at her during graduation. Students bullying other students in the presence of officials shouldn't be tolerated. The rest of it though, as cold as this sounds, she deserved. Yes they're young and stupid, but that doesn't un-impregnate a sexually active teen. That doesn't un-kill students in a drunk driving accident. And it certainly doesn't un-text naked pictures you send to someone VOLUNTARILY.
This is just another reminder to people that we share information quickly these days. This isn't something where you have to make photocopies and distribute them, this is where you click "forward" and get on with your life. If you're going to send those pictures, crop 'em better, download some from the internet and say that it's you in the pic. Teens commit suicide all the time, and many of them for things they didn't start. Maybe we should be more worried about them. Again, my heart goes out to people who lose someone, but lets just own up to our own mistakes from now on.
Email Shaun
Sexting Tragedy: Jamie Metrick
Okay parents, I'm going to say something you probably don't want to hear; teens are sexual beings. Your teenagers have sex lives whether or not they have full-on intercourse. They are exploring their sexual likes and dislikes and are hopefully finding safe, responsible, and healthy sexual outlets. Teenagers also know a lot more about technology than you do. So of course they have figured out how to use something as innocuous as texting to explore their sexual playfulness. Now I'm going to say something teens don't want to hear; don't send pictures of your genitals over the phone/internet! Even if your boy/girlfriend swears they'll be the only one to see it somehow, someway someone else is going to see it. You could have a vengeful ex, a prying parent, or just a nosy friend with a forwarding list.
Unfortunately, Jessica Logan made this mistake. But that's all it was, a stupid teenage mistake. What Ryan Saylers allegedly did, on the other hand, was cruel and humiliating and could have landed him in jail. In fact their are several cases in the U.S. of seventeen and eighteen-year-olds being charged with distributing child pornography for possessing nude pictures of their consenting partners who are minors. Saylers is lucky to not have his life ruined but chose to make Logan's short life a living hell in return. To me this is not so much a "sexting scandal" as it is just another case in a continuing problem of extreme bullying and harassment amongst teens. The details of this case sound very familiar to me: a girl who is really the victim of sexual exploitation is blamed, ostracized, and harassed by her fellow schoolmates. Jessica's parents have a right to sue Saylers and Co. for emotional cruelty, Officer Payne for giving their daughter truly dumb advice, and the school board for turning a blind eye to Logan's obvious harassment.
While I personally don't see the merit in sexting, teens are still going to do it. And you know what, it is their right to explore their sexuality and take the risk of exposure if they want to. Parents ultimately cannot control the raging bundle of hormones and curiosity that are teenagers, and maybe to a reasonable extent they should not. No matter how much abstinence-only brainwashing you teach or how many chastity rings you can slip on their fingers, teens are going get frisky. The best parents and schools can do is have honest, comprehensive sex ed. programs and help teens make informed decisions about sex. That, and stricter anti-bullying policies.
Email Jamie
Unfortunately, Jessica Logan made this mistake. But that's all it was, a stupid teenage mistake. What Ryan Saylers allegedly did, on the other hand, was cruel and humiliating and could have landed him in jail. In fact their are several cases in the U.S. of seventeen and eighteen-year-olds being charged with distributing child pornography for possessing nude pictures of their consenting partners who are minors. Saylers is lucky to not have his life ruined but chose to make Logan's short life a living hell in return. To me this is not so much a "sexting scandal" as it is just another case in a continuing problem of extreme bullying and harassment amongst teens. The details of this case sound very familiar to me: a girl who is really the victim of sexual exploitation is blamed, ostracized, and harassed by her fellow schoolmates. Jessica's parents have a right to sue Saylers and Co. for emotional cruelty, Officer Payne for giving their daughter truly dumb advice, and the school board for turning a blind eye to Logan's obvious harassment.
While I personally don't see the merit in sexting, teens are still going to do it. And you know what, it is their right to explore their sexuality and take the risk of exposure if they want to. Parents ultimately cannot control the raging bundle of hormones and curiosity that are teenagers, and maybe to a reasonable extent they should not. No matter how much abstinence-only brainwashing you teach or how many chastity rings you can slip on their fingers, teens are going get frisky. The best parents and schools can do is have honest, comprehensive sex ed. programs and help teens make informed decisions about sex. That, and stricter anti-bullying policies.
Email Jamie
Sexting Tragedy: Sasha Smith
Jessica's case is not an uncommon one with today's youth. There have been several news stories in the past couple years with similar stories of teenage girls and boys using technology to send each other inappropriate pictures and videos of themselves. Many question if it's even okay for adults to participate in "sexting." I think it's controversial only because once the images from this intimate moment are no longer in your sole possession, it is virtually impossible to control who views it. I don't think we can continue to blame others i.e. Ryan, school board or police officers if it was a situation that one had full control over.
It's important for parents and guardians to explain to their children what consequences are. Not all teenagers are "sexting." I didn't even think about doing that when I was in high school or college. I was well aware of all the similar cases that were before Jessica and knew that the Internet gave folks the capability to access your whole life. I've first handed witnessed this at my college when another student taped into the server and retrieved an intimate video of a couple on his dorm's floor. The young woman and man were devastated at their home made video circulating all over campus. I felt empathy for the young woman the same way that I feel empathy for Jessica's family but it's not the community's sole job to raise one's children.
The community members involved (police officer and school board) could have taken more drastic positions but in the end there is no way that they would have been able to stop all the kids from harassing her at all times. The truth is kids can be very cruel at times. I was a survivor of many bullies throughout my childhood and it wasn't always easy. But I did have strong values that I gained from my parents which helped me get through some of the difficult decisions I had to make as a teenager growing up. I don't want to sound like I'm blaming the parents - I just think parents play an important role in how young people make choices. I think it's important for parents to be open and honest with their kids.
It's unfortunate what happened to Jessica and I will have her and her family in my thoughts.
Email Sasha
It's important for parents and guardians to explain to their children what consequences are. Not all teenagers are "sexting." I didn't even think about doing that when I was in high school or college. I was well aware of all the similar cases that were before Jessica and knew that the Internet gave folks the capability to access your whole life. I've first handed witnessed this at my college when another student taped into the server and retrieved an intimate video of a couple on his dorm's floor. The young woman and man were devastated at their home made video circulating all over campus. I felt empathy for the young woman the same way that I feel empathy for Jessica's family but it's not the community's sole job to raise one's children.
The community members involved (police officer and school board) could have taken more drastic positions but in the end there is no way that they would have been able to stop all the kids from harassing her at all times. The truth is kids can be very cruel at times. I was a survivor of many bullies throughout my childhood and it wasn't always easy. But I did have strong values that I gained from my parents which helped me get through some of the difficult decisions I had to make as a teenager growing up. I don't want to sound like I'm blaming the parents - I just think parents play an important role in how young people make choices. I think it's important for parents to be open and honest with their kids.
It's unfortunate what happened to Jessica and I will have her and her family in my thoughts.
Email Sasha
Sexting Tragedy: Have Your Say
Now that you've read what our panel thought on this subject, have your say by leaving a comment.
Wednesday, December 9, 2009
The ABCs of Adam Lambert
Jeff, Art, Scott, Austin and guest contributor Ryan Allen give their opinions on Adam Lambert and ABC's position. After you've read were they stand on the topic, join the conversation by leaving a comment.
The ABCs of Adam Lambert: Jeff Weiss
If you ask anyone about me, I'm confident two words that will come up are “American” and “Idol.” The FOX hit is my favorite television show - however to me it's so much more than a TV show. I see American Idol as more of an event. Not unlike the NFL, there is a pre-season (the Idol auditions), a regular season (the top 32), playoffs (the top 12), and of course the Super Bowl (the finale). I eagerly anticipate the weekly performance shows, after which I happily text my votes and wait 24 hours to find out who will be sent home. Last season I fully expected Adam Lambert to win. Week after week, he did everything the judges requested for seven previous seasons by taking risks, adding his own style to each song he sang, and he consistently performed well. And then he lost to Kris Allen. I anticipated Lambert becoming another Chris Daughtry or Jennifer Hudson and eclipse the actual winner of the show with a very successful career. Now, I'm not so sure that will happen.
During the American Music Awards on ABC last month, Lambert performed his new single “For Your Entertainment” but it was anything but entertaining. Shocking? Yes. Scandalous? You betcha. Disturbing, vulgar, and borderline obscene? Yep, yes-siree, and uh-huh. I won't go into detail about exactly what he did because everyone has talked and written about it ad nauseum, and there are photos of it above. After the performance, ABC canceled Lambert's scheduled performances on Good Morning America and Jimmy Kimmel Live, then quickly retreated and allowed him to perform in a taped segment for The View. I believe ABC gave in when they should have stuck to their guns. Twenty years ago, comedian Andrew Dice Clay was “banned for life” by MTV after using the “f-word” on live television during the music channel's Video Music Awards. When was the last time you saw or heard about Clay?
If the media would stop glamorizing the worst of entertainment, talented performers like Adam Lambert would quickly learn that they don't need to shock, horrify, and embarrass their audience to gain attention. Sometimes we just like to see and hear good performances - and if you are truly talented, giving a good performance shouldn't be a difficult task.
Email Jeff
During the American Music Awards on ABC last month, Lambert performed his new single “For Your Entertainment” but it was anything but entertaining. Shocking? Yes. Scandalous? You betcha. Disturbing, vulgar, and borderline obscene? Yep, yes-siree, and uh-huh. I won't go into detail about exactly what he did because everyone has talked and written about it ad nauseum, and there are photos of it above. After the performance, ABC canceled Lambert's scheduled performances on Good Morning America and Jimmy Kimmel Live, then quickly retreated and allowed him to perform in a taped segment for The View. I believe ABC gave in when they should have stuck to their guns. Twenty years ago, comedian Andrew Dice Clay was “banned for life” by MTV after using the “f-word” on live television during the music channel's Video Music Awards. When was the last time you saw or heard about Clay?
If the media would stop glamorizing the worst of entertainment, talented performers like Adam Lambert would quickly learn that they don't need to shock, horrify, and embarrass their audience to gain attention. Sometimes we just like to see and hear good performances - and if you are truly talented, giving a good performance shouldn't be a difficult task.
Email Jeff
The ABCs of Adam Lambert: David Loftus
Once again I’m going to disclose my pop cultural ignorance (this time by stating that I have no idea who Adam Lambert is) and my elitism (by adding that I don’t care to find out). Undoubtedly, he’s a flavor-of-the-month singer who, if he has anything of substance and quality to offer (and just hearing that he came to prominence on American Idol strongly implies to me that he doesn’t), will turn up again in years to come, from other sources, for better reasons … and I am happy to wait until then to become acquainted with his work.
I’m fairly certain that Mr. Lambert knowingly sought to make eyebrows rise and jaws drop; that ABC reacted just as it is supposed to (with pretended outrage, even though almost no one at the network could care less about his display, whatever it was, but they have to reassure the most conservative segment of their audience that they “never would have allowed this to happen if they had known in advance…”) and is now trying to placate his fans by switching directions; that anyone who complained is living out his or her script as well, and if people truly feel outraged about such “entertainment,” then they should take a more active role in deciding what to watch and what to turn off, and find something better to do with their time -- both in terms of entertainment and things to get upset about.
It’s all a lot of preposterous triviality on the part of folks who are taking themselves way too seriously -- what a more worthwhile entertainer called “Much Ado About Nothing.”
I’m fairly certain that Mr. Lambert knowingly sought to make eyebrows rise and jaws drop; that ABC reacted just as it is supposed to (with pretended outrage, even though almost no one at the network could care less about his display, whatever it was, but they have to reassure the most conservative segment of their audience that they “never would have allowed this to happen if they had known in advance…”) and is now trying to placate his fans by switching directions; that anyone who complained is living out his or her script as well, and if people truly feel outraged about such “entertainment,” then they should take a more active role in deciding what to watch and what to turn off, and find something better to do with their time -- both in terms of entertainment and things to get upset about.
It’s all a lot of preposterous triviality on the part of folks who are taking themselves way too seriously -- what a more worthwhile entertainer called “Much Ado About Nothing.”
The ABCs of Adam Lambert: Scott Hinkley
I had the strange experience of watching the AMAs with all the outrageous parts already edited out, so it is hard for me to guess what my reaction would have been had I seen it live and not on YouTube. I didn't really have a problem with Adam's "inappropriate" behavior, but I understand why ABC had to react so strongly to it. I don't think the network actually took on an "anti-Lambert" position, I think they just needed to be clear who wears the pants. ABC stands to have their image defined by almost anything that she broadcast, so lewd gestures are more than poor taste, it raises questions about the network, since most audience members would naturally assume that there would not be unexpected parts of the show.
I think ABC, and it's parent Disney, is in a difficult position in terms of values. On the one hand, they embrace and support many progressive causes, and on the other, a major contingency of there American audience is religious and conservative. I think that if Adam wants to be a star, he is right to feel that he needs to establish his identity, but for his sake, I think he should make nice with the money until he has some of his own. Then he can be as George Michael as he wants.
Email Scott
I think ABC, and it's parent Disney, is in a difficult position in terms of values. On the one hand, they embrace and support many progressive causes, and on the other, a major contingency of there American audience is religious and conservative. I think that if Adam wants to be a star, he is right to feel that he needs to establish his identity, but for his sake, I think he should make nice with the money until he has some of his own. Then he can be as George Michael as he wants.
Email Scott
The ABCs of Adam Lambert: Austin Lee
“I voted for the $87 billion, before I voted against it,” were the words that pretty much sealed John Kerry’s fate in the 2004 elections. He was immediately cast as a flip-flopper or someone that couldn’t seem to make up his mind about what he stood for. At best his change of mind was simply that: a change of mind on a very important issue; at worst this was a concerted attempt at pandering to the anti-war voters. The end result left John Kerry appearing to be someone that couldn’t make up his mind.
ABC aired the American Music Awards featuring a fairly disturbing performance by Adam Lambert. I don’t care if he was a straight guy performing those acts on a woman: that was an indecent performance. ABC promptly canceled his appearances on their network and it looked like the matter was closed. Now ABC seems to be pulling a John Kerry and flip-flopping.
I know that they cannot permanently ban Adam from their airwaves; however, he has shown no remorse for his actions. ABC would do well to heed John Kerry’s missteps and force Adam to apologize for his risqué performance before he is allowed to use their platform to pitch his new album. All that this does is indicate that ABC doesn’t care what happened and only waited until the noise died down (thanks Tiger Woods) before having Adam appear again.
Email Austin
ABC aired the American Music Awards featuring a fairly disturbing performance by Adam Lambert. I don’t care if he was a straight guy performing those acts on a woman: that was an indecent performance. ABC promptly canceled his appearances on their network and it looked like the matter was closed. Now ABC seems to be pulling a John Kerry and flip-flopping.
I know that they cannot permanently ban Adam from their airwaves; however, he has shown no remorse for his actions. ABC would do well to heed John Kerry’s missteps and force Adam to apologize for his risqué performance before he is allowed to use their platform to pitch his new album. All that this does is indicate that ABC doesn’t care what happened and only waited until the noise died down (thanks Tiger Woods) before having Adam appear again.
Email Austin
The ABCs of Adam Lambert: Ryan John
A television special in honor of twenty-five years of Motown aired in 1983 called Motown 25: Yesterday, Today and Forever. The highlight of the night was Michael Jackson performance of "Billie Jean" for the first time since the release of his 1982 best seller "Thriller:. Many called this the best live performance ever and made that night one the most memorable in music history. This was also the night that Jackson introduced the world to the moonwalk.
Albert Lambert made jaws drop in his debut performance of his first single, "For Your Entertainment" at the ABC American Music Awards. But, he didn't’ do it with the moonwalk or any other musical attribute. He did it with leashes, sexual simulations, and male on male kissing. I know, I know…woman performers have done this time and time again and nobody says anything to them. First of all, when women do this sort of thing, they too are criticized for their indiscretion. Second, I don’t have enough space here to clarify, but there is a warranted double standard here: the world views two men kissing as more offensive than two women kissing. And let’s face it- it was Madonna and Britney Spears! They could have given each a fist bump and people would have talked about it for weeks.
The Lambert performance sparked only 1,500 calls in complaints compared to the 500,000 during Janet Jackson’s “wardrobe malfunction.” He was able to slide a little because it wasn’t prime time in most areas of the country. But, Lambert says that he was simply acting out the words of his song, and got caught up in the crowd at the Nokia Theatre while unapologetically declaring he is not a babysitter. Whether you’re here to watch my kids, sit and talk about life insurance, or entertain me for a few minutes, I wouldn't invite what we saw on November 22nd into my home. ABC should have canceled his scheduled performances and needs to send the message that what Lambert did is not welcomed, encouraged behavior. Although I think we’re in a liberal minded 2009 and ABC is doesn't mind its name attached to a controversy for now, they and other networks will delay performances for a while. Before this becomes "his thing," Lambert should probably tone it down for now. Besides, who wants to only be known only for this stuff when you’re a talented singer and dancer like I’m assuming he is?
Albert Lambert made jaws drop in his debut performance of his first single, "For Your Entertainment" at the ABC American Music Awards. But, he didn't’ do it with the moonwalk or any other musical attribute. He did it with leashes, sexual simulations, and male on male kissing. I know, I know…woman performers have done this time and time again and nobody says anything to them. First of all, when women do this sort of thing, they too are criticized for their indiscretion. Second, I don’t have enough space here to clarify, but there is a warranted double standard here: the world views two men kissing as more offensive than two women kissing. And let’s face it- it was Madonna and Britney Spears! They could have given each a fist bump and people would have talked about it for weeks.
The Lambert performance sparked only 1,500 calls in complaints compared to the 500,000 during Janet Jackson’s “wardrobe malfunction.” He was able to slide a little because it wasn’t prime time in most areas of the country. But, Lambert says that he was simply acting out the words of his song, and got caught up in the crowd at the Nokia Theatre while unapologetically declaring he is not a babysitter. Whether you’re here to watch my kids, sit and talk about life insurance, or entertain me for a few minutes, I wouldn't invite what we saw on November 22nd into my home. ABC should have canceled his scheduled performances and needs to send the message that what Lambert did is not welcomed, encouraged behavior. Although I think we’re in a liberal minded 2009 and ABC is doesn't mind its name attached to a controversy for now, they and other networks will delay performances for a while. Before this becomes "his thing," Lambert should probably tone it down for now. Besides, who wants to only be known only for this stuff when you’re a talented singer and dancer like I’m assuming he is?
The ABCs of Adam Lambert: Have Your Say
Now that you've read what our panel thought on this subject, have your say by leaving a comment.
Tuesday, December 8, 2009
Can You Hear the Fee?
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) sent an open letter on Friday to Verizon asking the nation's largest cell phone carrier to provide details on the increase, as well as requesting an explanation as to why Verizon charges customers $1.99 for accidentally accessing Verizon Wireless's Mobile Web without a data plan.
Today, Jeff, Scott, Jamie, and Sasha share their opinions about Verizon's new policy and the FCC's inquiry. After reading their thoughts, have your say by leaving a comment.
Can You Hear the Fee: Jeff Weiss
My first impression of a cell phone carrier doubling their early termination fee is: there must be a lot of people canceling early. The thought of being charged $350 if I wish to break my contract does not bode well for me as a consumer who is making a choice about cell phone carriers.
I understand that cell phone companies spend a lot of money to acquire new customers. They discount expensive phones, offer promotional deals on services, not to mention the labor involved from the salesperson in the store to the person performing the credit check that ensures you won't be a financial risk once your billing begins. However, Verizon's new policy of charging $350 for an early termination fee for a smart phone is excessive. It's $150 more than what Sprint and T-Mobile charge and double what AT&T (the home of the iPhone) charges.
I stand by my first impression. If a company wants to charge me an excessive fee for canceling their service, I have to suspect that many people have canceled early and the company is trying to stop the bleeding. And that tells me as a consumer to chose a different company.
Email Jeff
I understand that cell phone companies spend a lot of money to acquire new customers. They discount expensive phones, offer promotional deals on services, not to mention the labor involved from the salesperson in the store to the person performing the credit check that ensures you won't be a financial risk once your billing begins. However, Verizon's new policy of charging $350 for an early termination fee for a smart phone is excessive. It's $150 more than what Sprint and T-Mobile charge and double what AT&T (the home of the iPhone) charges.
I stand by my first impression. If a company wants to charge me an excessive fee for canceling their service, I have to suspect that many people have canceled early and the company is trying to stop the bleeding. And that tells me as a consumer to chose a different company.
Email Jeff
Can You Hear the Fee: Scott Hinkley
I don't have a problem with the fee Verizon charges. I think that Verizon is acting wisely in defending their smartphone client base, especially with all the rumors circulating about an iPhone coming their way soon. If they continue to lose smartphone users while they wait to become more competitive, they will certainly have a hard time wooing back those users once they have made the major investment in the phones.
I feel that much like land-lines came to be considered a right rather than a privilege, we are now in a time where a mobile phone is far less of a luxury than a need. That being said, there is no necessity attached to the latest, hottest technology. I have no problem with asking people who want the current gear to pay the price for low-cost, wide coverage service that can be afforded by those who need it to find jobs right now.
Email Scott
I feel that much like land-lines came to be considered a right rather than a privilege, we are now in a time where a mobile phone is far less of a luxury than a need. That being said, there is no necessity attached to the latest, hottest technology. I have no problem with asking people who want the current gear to pay the price for low-cost, wide coverage service that can be afforded by those who need it to find jobs right now.
Email Scott
Can You Hear the Fee: Jamie Metrick
Verizon has been my own cellular phone provider for a number of years. Me and my family switched from another network for a better family package and the reception improved significantly. So when my parents decided to switch cable providers, they thought they'd give Verizon Fios a try. But from the beginning, with a botched installation that ruined their house's siding, it was nothing but trouble. It took a hard-won lawsuit just to get Verizon to agree to repair the damage to the house. My father furious with the lack of good customer service, immediately tried to cancel the plan. However, he was stuck: Fios runs on fiber optic cable which replaced all the copper wiring that could not be switched back and the termination fee was so expensive, it was cheaper to keep it.
They have had Fios for over a year, the cable quality is only average and they still pay a ridiculous amount per month. Verizon does what it is supposed to do: provide a solid, if not superior service. They charge way too much, period. A cancellation fee of $350 is above and beyond any phone bill someone could rack up in a couple of months. And charging people for accidental button-pressing, why not charge for dialing wrong numbers too? I think Verizon is guilty of good old fashioned highway robbery. Good for the FCC doing something genuine to protect consumers' rights and not worrying about celebrity nipples for once.
Email Jamie
They have had Fios for over a year, the cable quality is only average and they still pay a ridiculous amount per month. Verizon does what it is supposed to do: provide a solid, if not superior service. They charge way too much, period. A cancellation fee of $350 is above and beyond any phone bill someone could rack up in a couple of months. And charging people for accidental button-pressing, why not charge for dialing wrong numbers too? I think Verizon is guilty of good old fashioned highway robbery. Good for the FCC doing something genuine to protect consumers' rights and not worrying about celebrity nipples for once.
Email Jamie
Can You Hear the Fee: Sasha Smith
"Can you?...Can you hear me now?" This is the infamous line that made Verizon's commercial brand. As consumers we all know that Verizon has the least amount of dropped calls and the most towers that provide this wonderful service. But Verizon is also known as the most expensive carrier out of the major nationwide carriers.
I find the timing of Verizon raising their early termination fee interesting. I believe the government finally working on passing a law that stated that customers will be able to bring their phones with them to sign a new contract with a new carrier. This would eliminate particular companies like AT&T holding the rights to the iPhone. Once a customer's plan was up with At&T they then go switch to Verizon with their iPhone. I think this is how it should be. The cost of phones have gotten a little out of control and companies are solely trying to entice new customers with their phones and not their service quality.
It's really disappointing that Verizon felt the need in this economy to raise the cost of people leaving their company. It's a form of economic power and control and is Verizon is now the big cell phone bully. I've been really proud of the FCC this year and feel they are sticking up for the consumers. I think they have the right to ask Verizon for some answers. I look forward to what they have to say. In the mean time, I'll keep writing emails to save money.
Email Sasha
I find the timing of Verizon raising their early termination fee interesting. I believe the government finally working on passing a law that stated that customers will be able to bring their phones with them to sign a new contract with a new carrier. This would eliminate particular companies like AT&T holding the rights to the iPhone. Once a customer's plan was up with At&T they then go switch to Verizon with their iPhone. I think this is how it should be. The cost of phones have gotten a little out of control and companies are solely trying to entice new customers with their phones and not their service quality.
It's really disappointing that Verizon felt the need in this economy to raise the cost of people leaving their company. It's a form of economic power and control and is Verizon is now the big cell phone bully. I've been really proud of the FCC this year and feel they are sticking up for the consumers. I think they have the right to ask Verizon for some answers. I look forward to what they have to say. In the mean time, I'll keep writing emails to save money.
Email Sasha
Can You Hear the Fee: Have your say
Now that you've read what our panel thought on this subject, have your say by leaving a comment.
Monday, December 7, 2009
Amanda Knox Verdict
The prosecutors' evidence against Knox and Sollecito was based upon a microscopic speck of Sollecito's DNA on a bra clasp that was believed to have been torn from Kercher's back during the killing, and another microscopic speck of biological substance compatible with Kercher on a kitchen knife randomly picked by police Sollecito's home after his arrest, with Knox's DNA on the handle. Prosecutors said Knox and Sollecito took the kitchen knife back to Sollecito's house after cleaning the crime scene. Experts who testified for the defense said the amounts of biological material were too small to be verified, and could have been the result of contamination at the crime scene or in the lab.
Many American legal experts are dismayed by the guilty verdicts and say the Italian media tried and convicted Amanda Knox before the trial began.
Jeff, Art,Shaun, and Scott weigh in on the verdict. After reading their thoughts, join the conversation by leaving a comment.
Amanda Knox Verdict: Jeff Weiss
Did Amanda Knox receive a fair trial? Probably not. There were gaping holes in the prosecution's case. There was no physical evidence of Knox found at the crime scene – no finger prints, not even a strand of hair. Not one witness could place her anywhere near the crime scene on the night of the murder. DNA experts questioned the little evidence that was presented by the prosecution. The case itself is tied to the career of a prosecutor who is under indictment for professional misconduct. Since the murder of Knox's roommate Meredith Kercher in 2007, the Italian media has painted Knox as a sex-crazed killer, calling her a "devil with an angel's face.” Knoxhas been the center of so much media attention that she was named the most famous woman in Italy in a poll last year.
And now, a 22 year old student has been sentenced to 26 years in prison. Of course, there will be an appeal. But even if Knox is found not guilty in an appeal and released, so much of her life has been taken from her it is hard to imagine things will ever be “normal” for her again. The family of Meredith Kercher has said they are satisfied with the outcome of the trial. If I were them, I'd be asking for more answers. At the very least, for the sake of Meredith Kercher's memory.
Email Jeff
And now, a 22 year old student has been sentenced to 26 years in prison. Of course, there will be an appeal. But even if Knox is found not guilty in an appeal and released, so much of her life has been taken from her it is hard to imagine things will ever be “normal” for her again. The family of Meredith Kercher has said they are satisfied with the outcome of the trial. If I were them, I'd be asking for more answers. At the very least, for the sake of Meredith Kercher's memory.
Email Jeff
Amanda Knox Verdict: David Loftus
I am not in a position to concoct even a half-informed opinion on the Amanda Knox verdict. I certainly didn’t follow the trial from inside the courtroom, and coverage of its progress has been spotty in the American press. I don’t know the Italian legal system to the extent that I am familiar with the American one, having served on a jury, been a plaintiff and a defendant in different cases (won a jury verdict in the former and had the latter settle long before it got anywhere near trial), and worked for a law publisher in Boston in the 1980s and inside law firms for most of the past decade.
It’s too easy to offer an opinion on matters about which one knows little. We do it all the time. A good, honest “I don’t know” is hard to come by in this country, and people should learn to use it and to respect when others do. Heaven knows there have been jury verdicts in this country that made the average American either scratch his head or scream with outrage, from the multi-million-dollar award for spilled hot coffee at a McDonald’s to the conclusion of O.J. Simpson’s criminal homicide trial. If we don’t understand our own jury system, how could we pretend to grasp what went on in an Italian courtroom?
It’s also too easy to feel umbrage toward foreigners, and to kick their version of one of our favorite whipping boys, the media. I’ve seen some of what has been claimed was written about Amanda Knox, but I have no idea where these quotations came from -- were they the local equivalent of the National Enquirer and other supermarket tabloids -- and who is conveying them to us, and for what purpose? Anything that goes on outside a courtroom could be showmanship that has nothing to do with establishing the facts of a case and reaching justice.
What I can say is that I am not impressed by an American exchange student who admits in court to having sex with an Italian boyfriend and smoking pot at the age of 20 while on an overseas study trip. This does not strike me as making the most of a golden educational opportunity, but more the behavior of a spoiled American kid who is having fun misbehaving while away from her family and homeland. She may or may not have committed homicide, but she was dangerously careless and stupid not to have conducted herself more carefully and responsibly on foreign soil.
It’s too easy to offer an opinion on matters about which one knows little. We do it all the time. A good, honest “I don’t know” is hard to come by in this country, and people should learn to use it and to respect when others do. Heaven knows there have been jury verdicts in this country that made the average American either scratch his head or scream with outrage, from the multi-million-dollar award for spilled hot coffee at a McDonald’s to the conclusion of O.J. Simpson’s criminal homicide trial. If we don’t understand our own jury system, how could we pretend to grasp what went on in an Italian courtroom?
It’s also too easy to feel umbrage toward foreigners, and to kick their version of one of our favorite whipping boys, the media. I’ve seen some of what has been claimed was written about Amanda Knox, but I have no idea where these quotations came from -- were they the local equivalent of the National Enquirer and other supermarket tabloids -- and who is conveying them to us, and for what purpose? Anything that goes on outside a courtroom could be showmanship that has nothing to do with establishing the facts of a case and reaching justice.
What I can say is that I am not impressed by an American exchange student who admits in court to having sex with an Italian boyfriend and smoking pot at the age of 20 while on an overseas study trip. This does not strike me as making the most of a golden educational opportunity, but more the behavior of a spoiled American kid who is having fun misbehaving while away from her family and homeland. She may or may not have committed homicide, but she was dangerously careless and stupid not to have conducted herself more carefully and responsibly on foreign soil.
Amanda Knox Verdict: Shaun Hautly
I don't know if Amanda Knox was guilty or not. The only reason we care about this is because Amanda Knox is an American and found guilty by a foreign court. They say the media had tried and convicted her before the trial began. I don't know what she did to get on the bad side of the media other than being an American. They said there wasn't substantial evidence. They said some crazy stories about a knife being taken back to someone's house. They said a lot, but before we get too upset about all this, let's take a little trip back in time.....
When two towers burned to the ground leaving no trace of planes, black boxes, or other standard artifacts, Americans wasted no time convicting the foreigner who's passport was found in the wreckage. A paper passport. We had a hunch, some evidence, and we never thought for a moment that maybe the foreigners weren't guilty, or at least AS guilty, as everyone was so determined. In many of the convictions, there was such little evidence it was astounding. However, Someone's DNA found on a knife and on someone's bra clasp? That's DNA. DNA doesn't assume. In fact, that's what it stands for: Does Not Assume.
After the 9/11 convictions, what did we do? We screened every middle eastern LOOKING person, and kept an eye open. Anyone from _______-istan was (and still is) treated like they were about to pull a trigger. All this considered, is it so hard to understand that when a foreigner is a suspect in a murder case, it's not so hard to assume the worst? Innocent until proven guilty? Innocent until proven foreign. It's standard psychology, and I never even took a psychology class. Someone looks different, or suspicious? Boom. Guilty. So take a page from OJ's book. If you're going to murder someone, do it on your native soil.
Email Shaun
When two towers burned to the ground leaving no trace of planes, black boxes, or other standard artifacts, Americans wasted no time convicting the foreigner who's passport was found in the wreckage. A paper passport. We had a hunch, some evidence, and we never thought for a moment that maybe the foreigners weren't guilty, or at least AS guilty, as everyone was so determined. In many of the convictions, there was such little evidence it was astounding. However, Someone's DNA found on a knife and on someone's bra clasp? That's DNA. DNA doesn't assume. In fact, that's what it stands for: Does Not Assume.
After the 9/11 convictions, what did we do? We screened every middle eastern LOOKING person, and kept an eye open. Anyone from _______-istan was (and still is) treated like they were about to pull a trigger. All this considered, is it so hard to understand that when a foreigner is a suspect in a murder case, it's not so hard to assume the worst? Innocent until proven guilty? Innocent until proven foreign. It's standard psychology, and I never even took a psychology class. Someone looks different, or suspicious? Boom. Guilty. So take a page from OJ's book. If you're going to murder someone, do it on your native soil.
Email Shaun
Amanda Knox Verdict: Scott Hinkley
I can't say if Amanda received a fair trial. I don't think she received a deliberately unfair trial. I am happy to see that the death sentence has been taken off the table, and now, unfortunately, I think it will be up to her and her family to work to prove her side of the story. I feel that from the perspective of the Italian prosecutors, judge and jury, there was enough suspicion in her guilt that none of them probably dared risking letting her go. I don't know that I believe the Italian people know in their hearts that she committed these crimes, but as soon as she gets off, she is G.O.N.E. Now she has to stick around and work for a long time to convince people that she didn't do it.
I can only imagine how horrifying this experience must be for her family, but to Amanda I ask, "how can you piss off so many people that they think you are guilty of something you didn't do?" I hope for her sake this really is a terrible mistake, but more urgently, if she isn't guilty, someone should keep looking into this. I don't know that Secretary Clinton is the best person for the job, but at least she is demonstrating restraint for the time being. P.S. Obama's been hopping around the globe trying to nice-it-up with all the folks we've been pissing off for the past 100 plus years, so lets not go salt his game and change Italian Dressing to Ignorance Dressing just because Amanda hasn't been set free yet.
Email Scott
I can only imagine how horrifying this experience must be for her family, but to Amanda I ask, "how can you piss off so many people that they think you are guilty of something you didn't do?" I hope for her sake this really is a terrible mistake, but more urgently, if she isn't guilty, someone should keep looking into this. I don't know that Secretary Clinton is the best person for the job, but at least she is demonstrating restraint for the time being. P.S. Obama's been hopping around the globe trying to nice-it-up with all the folks we've been pissing off for the past 100 plus years, so lets not go salt his game and change Italian Dressing to Ignorance Dressing just because Amanda hasn't been set free yet.
Email Scott
Amanda Knox Verdict: Have Your Say
Now that you've read what our panel thought on this subject, have your say by leaving a comment.
Sunday, December 6, 2009
Week in Review - Sunday
After reading their thoughts, have your say by leaving a comment.
Week in Review - Sunday: Nikki Lorenzini
The Curious Case of Tiger Woods
I originally wasn’t going to write about Tiger Woods. Yesterday I wrote about Meredith Baxter and I thought that focusing on one “Hollywood” type for one weekend was enough for me. But I was sitting around earlier reading, and it dawned on me that I really wanted to write about Tiger Woods after all.
Since the original posts on Wednesday, more junk has come out about him - about nasty text messages and voice mails and Las Vegas cocktail waitresses. There is so much to say about that. We still don't know all the exact details, but just for fun, lets say that it is possible that his wife chased him out of the house as he was in his boxers, and smashed the window of his car because he cheated. Now he’s caught. I just love, love, love how the media has given the mistresses all the attention by parading them on TV and giving them their fifteen minutes. Why is the media glorifying the mistresses? Called me old fashioned, but shouldn’t the mistresses be shamed just like Tiger Woods is being shamed for cheating? You can not tell me that those women did not know who he was. I hate golf with a passion yet I know who Tiger Woods is. Heck, I could even pick him out of the line up. But he is the only one getting crap. Yes, he should get crap for it, but I would really like to give these mistresses he had half of that crap. I mean, seriously - they knew he was married. They knew he had children. Yet, the media is glorifying them, and giving Tiger Woods hell. So not cool, man.
Now my other problem is with the media. Yes, Tiger is in the spotlight, and yes he did sign up for this. But why must I be bombarded with his marital problems? I mean, seriously, I barely want to know about my parents marital problems, and we live in the same house. I get it, he plays great golf so I heard (like I said, hate golf). But I couldn’t care less about his private life. I stabbed myself with a pencil the other day at work, where was my media coverage? I think that the media in the past few years has gotten totally out of control. Yes, people love reading about the stars lives, but I really believe that if these tabloiders go away and we don’t hear about these stars private lives, we will all be better off with out. I am pretty sure that they can be forgotten about.
So please, let Tiger work on his marriage in peace and let his money hungry mistresses be shamed right along with him.
Email Nikki
I originally wasn’t going to write about Tiger Woods. Yesterday I wrote about Meredith Baxter and I thought that focusing on one “Hollywood” type for one weekend was enough for me. But I was sitting around earlier reading, and it dawned on me that I really wanted to write about Tiger Woods after all.
Since the original posts on Wednesday, more junk has come out about him - about nasty text messages and voice mails and Las Vegas cocktail waitresses. There is so much to say about that. We still don't know all the exact details, but just for fun, lets say that it is possible that his wife chased him out of the house as he was in his boxers, and smashed the window of his car because he cheated. Now he’s caught. I just love, love, love how the media has given the mistresses all the attention by parading them on TV and giving them their fifteen minutes. Why is the media glorifying the mistresses? Called me old fashioned, but shouldn’t the mistresses be shamed just like Tiger Woods is being shamed for cheating? You can not tell me that those women did not know who he was. I hate golf with a passion yet I know who Tiger Woods is. Heck, I could even pick him out of the line up. But he is the only one getting crap. Yes, he should get crap for it, but I would really like to give these mistresses he had half of that crap. I mean, seriously - they knew he was married. They knew he had children. Yet, the media is glorifying them, and giving Tiger Woods hell. So not cool, man.
Now my other problem is with the media. Yes, Tiger is in the spotlight, and yes he did sign up for this. But why must I be bombarded with his marital problems? I mean, seriously, I barely want to know about my parents marital problems, and we live in the same house. I get it, he plays great golf so I heard (like I said, hate golf). But I couldn’t care less about his private life. I stabbed myself with a pencil the other day at work, where was my media coverage? I think that the media in the past few years has gotten totally out of control. Yes, people love reading about the stars lives, but I really believe that if these tabloiders go away and we don’t hear about these stars private lives, we will all be better off with out. I am pretty sure that they can be forgotten about.
So please, let Tiger work on his marriage in peace and let his money hungry mistresses be shamed right along with him.
Email Nikki
Week in Review - Sunday: Ryan John
Obama's New War Plan
On Tuesday, December 1, 2009 when President Barrack Obama made the formal announcement at West Point that additional troops will be sent to Afghanistan, he delivered on another campaign promise. I believe Obama knew from the beginning of his term that troop escalation in Afghanistan was going to an inevitable action early on his presidential watch. Joe Biden just about guaranteed a “major international crisis” shortly after Obama takes office that will test the administration greatly. Let’s not forget Obama campaigned as the President who was going to focus on what he considered the real war. He said we should be fighting a war against terror and that we were wasting time, lives and resources in Iraq. As President, he hand picked General Stanley A. McChrystal as the US commander of the forces in Afghanistan June 2009. In three short months, the general requested tens of thousands more troops be sent to Afghanistan for any possibility of success. Now usually when a boss hires an employee, it’s because they’re on the same page. Was the President at all surprised by the McChrystal recommendation? I think not. I mean, how could he be?
But, Obama was elected because he was the force of change. He was elected by the majority of the US population who saw no reason for us to continue with the War in Iraq and The McCain vs. Obama election became the national referendum on the war in Iraq. Needless to say, the democrats won. So how much change is really taking place when 30,000 troops will be deployed in six months. But, Obama had to seem reflective, pensive, and analytical before he made his final decision. It's kind of timely as well because we all know how occupied with the holidays we are around this time. As soon as President Obama took office, he worked towards fulfilling the promises of his liberal supporters. What we have here is a promise that Republicans in 2008 didn’t know they had. This is a promise that will undoubtedly get some Democrats scratching their heads, but should win him some points with the 9/12’er’s.
It’s clear that Obama took office knowing he was going to advance the military operation in the War against Terror. Now, I know the President doesn’t use the word “victory” and is only planning on using this troop surge to bully al-Qaeda far enough back for an Afghan take over and eventual American troop withdrawal. But I’m not confident that only 30,000 troops will deliver on that promise. I am confident though that the President won’t shy away from troop escalation in the fight to do so.
On Tuesday, December 1, 2009 when President Barrack Obama made the formal announcement at West Point that additional troops will be sent to Afghanistan, he delivered on another campaign promise. I believe Obama knew from the beginning of his term that troop escalation in Afghanistan was going to an inevitable action early on his presidential watch. Joe Biden just about guaranteed a “major international crisis” shortly after Obama takes office that will test the administration greatly. Let’s not forget Obama campaigned as the President who was going to focus on what he considered the real war. He said we should be fighting a war against terror and that we were wasting time, lives and resources in Iraq. As President, he hand picked General Stanley A. McChrystal as the US commander of the forces in Afghanistan June 2009. In three short months, the general requested tens of thousands more troops be sent to Afghanistan for any possibility of success. Now usually when a boss hires an employee, it’s because they’re on the same page. Was the President at all surprised by the McChrystal recommendation? I think not. I mean, how could he be?
But, Obama was elected because he was the force of change. He was elected by the majority of the US population who saw no reason for us to continue with the War in Iraq and The McCain vs. Obama election became the national referendum on the war in Iraq. Needless to say, the democrats won. So how much change is really taking place when 30,000 troops will be deployed in six months. But, Obama had to seem reflective, pensive, and analytical before he made his final decision. It's kind of timely as well because we all know how occupied with the holidays we are around this time. As soon as President Obama took office, he worked towards fulfilling the promises of his liberal supporters. What we have here is a promise that Republicans in 2008 didn’t know they had. This is a promise that will undoubtedly get some Democrats scratching their heads, but should win him some points with the 9/12’er’s.
It’s clear that Obama took office knowing he was going to advance the military operation in the War against Terror. Now, I know the President doesn’t use the word “victory” and is only planning on using this troop surge to bully al-Qaeda far enough back for an Afghan take over and eventual American troop withdrawal. But I’m not confident that only 30,000 troops will deliver on that promise. I am confident though that the President won’t shy away from troop escalation in the fight to do so.
Week in Review - Sunday: Have Your Say
Now that you've read what Nikki and Ryan thought about these topics, have your say by leaving a comment.
Saturday, December 5, 2009
Week in Review
Week in Review: Jeff Weiss
World AIDS Day
It's hard to imagine that 33 million people in the world are living with HIV/AIDS. It's harder to imagine that of those 33 million people, only 4 million of them are receiving treatment. 2008 brought three million new infections and claimed two million lives. While advancements have been made, there is no room to be complacent. While the media focuses on the “disease of the week” - currently H1N1, and prior to that SARS and the avian flu - HIV and AIDS doesn't get the amount of press it once did. Don't make the mistake of thinking because it is not generating headlines as it did ten or twenty years ago, the virus is no longer a threat. Yes, new infections are down and those infected are living longer, however half of new HIV infections occur in those under 25 years old and new cases in the gay community are on the rise after years of decline.
While it's nice to have a day set aside each year to support those living with HIV/AIDS and inform and educate those who are not, I think it's important to be vigilante in educating the the public on AIDS awareness and prevention every day.
Email Jeff
It's hard to imagine that 33 million people in the world are living with HIV/AIDS. It's harder to imagine that of those 33 million people, only 4 million of them are receiving treatment. 2008 brought three million new infections and claimed two million lives. While advancements have been made, there is no room to be complacent. While the media focuses on the “disease of the week” - currently H1N1, and prior to that SARS and the avian flu - HIV and AIDS doesn't get the amount of press it once did. Don't make the mistake of thinking because it is not generating headlines as it did ten or twenty years ago, the virus is no longer a threat. Yes, new infections are down and those infected are living longer, however half of new HIV infections occur in those under 25 years old and new cases in the gay community are on the rise after years of decline.
While it's nice to have a day set aside each year to support those living with HIV/AIDS and inform and educate those who are not, I think it's important to be vigilante in educating the the public on AIDS awareness and prevention every day.
Email Jeff
Week in Review: Nikki Lorenzini
Meredith Baxter's New Family Ties
I would like to make an announcement: I am straight. Phew, I feel so much better now that I said that. Well, no. I don’t feel better. Want to know what I feel? Why the heck does it even matter? There are two things with this whole situation that really bothers me: 1. Why do people make such a big deal about their sexuality and 2. Who the heck is Meredith Baxter?
If I make anyone mad or irritated with me: good. I would really like to know why people feel to make such an issue of their sexuality. Yes, I am straight, but there is so much more to me than just me liking guys. I am also a Christian, I like to read, write, bowl, sew, play miniature golf, go to movies, take random mini road trips, and enjoy food. I am sure it is absolutely freeing to actually admit that you are gay, and for that, I give you much kudos. If I had to make an announcement like that, I would absolutely mess myself. But to make your sexuality become your sole purpose, and have that as the one thing that people focus in on isn't for me. I am one of those people who likes to focus on the whole person, not just their sexuality. I would die if someone would only focus on aspect of my life. Don’t get me wrong, please be proud of who you are. For example, I am a proud Italian and not ashamed to admit it.
And Meredith Baxter? Really? Seriously? I am still baffled over this. So many questions arose when I heard it. One: Who? Two: And we care because. . .? She has had not been in the public eye for what, 20 years? Yeah, I was in first grade when she was last on TV. It makes me wonder if she is only doing this as a publicity stunt or if she really means it. And if she does mean it, why is she coming out on national television about it? I would under stand if Family Ties was on now, and she felt compelled to do it since she was actually relevant, but now? Personally, I would feel almost insulted that she is now admitting this. I feel that way because she is using her sexuality, something that people actually struggle with, and almost using it as publicity. Seriously, if she really needs money that badly, she needs to get a job.
Email Nikki
I would like to make an announcement: I am straight. Phew, I feel so much better now that I said that. Well, no. I don’t feel better. Want to know what I feel? Why the heck does it even matter? There are two things with this whole situation that really bothers me: 1. Why do people make such a big deal about their sexuality and 2. Who the heck is Meredith Baxter?
If I make anyone mad or irritated with me: good. I would really like to know why people feel to make such an issue of their sexuality. Yes, I am straight, but there is so much more to me than just me liking guys. I am also a Christian, I like to read, write, bowl, sew, play miniature golf, go to movies, take random mini road trips, and enjoy food. I am sure it is absolutely freeing to actually admit that you are gay, and for that, I give you much kudos. If I had to make an announcement like that, I would absolutely mess myself. But to make your sexuality become your sole purpose, and have that as the one thing that people focus in on isn't for me. I am one of those people who likes to focus on the whole person, not just their sexuality. I would die if someone would only focus on aspect of my life. Don’t get me wrong, please be proud of who you are. For example, I am a proud Italian and not ashamed to admit it.
And Meredith Baxter? Really? Seriously? I am still baffled over this. So many questions arose when I heard it. One: Who? Two: And we care because. . .? She has had not been in the public eye for what, 20 years? Yeah, I was in first grade when she was last on TV. It makes me wonder if she is only doing this as a publicity stunt or if she really means it. And if she does mean it, why is she coming out on national television about it? I would under stand if Family Ties was on now, and she felt compelled to do it since she was actually relevant, but now? Personally, I would feel almost insulted that she is now admitting this. I feel that way because she is using her sexuality, something that people actually struggle with, and almost using it as publicity. Seriously, if she really needs money that badly, she needs to get a job.
Email Nikki
Week in Review: Have Your Say
Now that you've read what Jeff and Nikki thought about these topics, have your say by leaving a comment.
Friday, December 4, 2009
Meredith Baxter's New Family Ties
Today our contributors discuss if celebrities like Meredith Baxter should be obligated to proclaim their sexual preference to the public, and if a 62 year old actress has as much to risk (or gain) by “coming out” as an up and coming celebrity such as 27 year old singer Adam Lambert. After reading what Art, Shaun, Austin, Sasha, and guest contributor Ryan Allen have to say, share your thoughts by leaving a comment.
Also today, in the second part of our continuning series Faith In America, Jeff looks at how and why we pray.
Meredith Baxter's New Family Ties: David Loftus
I have no idea who Meredith Baxter is. Since I grew up in a household without television, and later, when I owned one myself, I’ve rarely watched it except to catch up with movies on VHS and DVD, I have never seen an episode of Family Ties. But I sincerely wish Ms. Baxter all the best.
In an ideal world, her sexual preference would be nobody’s business. But we don’t live in an ideal world, and there are thousands -- perhaps millions -- of people who think of Ms. Baxter as a friend and mother, who think they know who and what she is; and millions more who continue to believe there is something wrong with homosexuality and lesbianism. It is for them, the people in both groups, and especially the intersection between the two, that I imagine Ms. Baxter spoke up. They need to realize that they didn’t know her after all, and because they care about her (or more properly, the person they thought they knew, based on the character she played) perhaps a few will look more kindly on gays and lesbians and their rights in this society and all over the world, as often happens when just plain folks learn that people they care about are gay (Dick Cheney and his daughter being a prime example).
Ms. Baxter wasn’t necessarily a lesbian all along. Perhaps she was heterosexual until recently. What does it matter? Personally, I suspect homosexuality isn’t necessarily genetically based or inherent, at least for some. The fact that so many professionals in theater, film, and sports are gay might not necessarily be evidence that they were so from birth, and that gays are drawn to such activities, but that such activities encourage gay behavior. People who are segregated by their professional and leisure activities tend to have more opportunities -- more encouragement -- to have sex with people of their own gender, and find they enjoy it. Many define themselves as bisexual, and some do not. (By the same token, those of us who consider ourselves unalterably straight might have discovered otherwise, given the right person and opportunity or particular set of circumstances.) This happens to some boys and girls in high school and college, before they go on to heterosexual marriages. And there’s nothing wrong with any of this, as long as it occurs between consenting adults.
It’ll be none too soon when gay marriages are legalized everywhere and nobody gives a damn who’s gay and who’s not. That day is coming -- far too slowly, but inevitably -- because more and more young people are perfectly aware that their friends are gay and there’s nothing wrong with that. Love is all too precious and rare -- no matter when and to whom we can give it and from whom receive it -- so any impediment to that, legal or social, needs to be identified and eradicated.
As soon as possible, and forever.
In an ideal world, her sexual preference would be nobody’s business. But we don’t live in an ideal world, and there are thousands -- perhaps millions -- of people who think of Ms. Baxter as a friend and mother, who think they know who and what she is; and millions more who continue to believe there is something wrong with homosexuality and lesbianism. It is for them, the people in both groups, and especially the intersection between the two, that I imagine Ms. Baxter spoke up. They need to realize that they didn’t know her after all, and because they care about her (or more properly, the person they thought they knew, based on the character she played) perhaps a few will look more kindly on gays and lesbians and their rights in this society and all over the world, as often happens when just plain folks learn that people they care about are gay (Dick Cheney and his daughter being a prime example).
Ms. Baxter wasn’t necessarily a lesbian all along. Perhaps she was heterosexual until recently. What does it matter? Personally, I suspect homosexuality isn’t necessarily genetically based or inherent, at least for some. The fact that so many professionals in theater, film, and sports are gay might not necessarily be evidence that they were so from birth, and that gays are drawn to such activities, but that such activities encourage gay behavior. People who are segregated by their professional and leisure activities tend to have more opportunities -- more encouragement -- to have sex with people of their own gender, and find they enjoy it. Many define themselves as bisexual, and some do not. (By the same token, those of us who consider ourselves unalterably straight might have discovered otherwise, given the right person and opportunity or particular set of circumstances.) This happens to some boys and girls in high school and college, before they go on to heterosexual marriages. And there’s nothing wrong with any of this, as long as it occurs between consenting adults.
It’ll be none too soon when gay marriages are legalized everywhere and nobody gives a damn who’s gay and who’s not. That day is coming -- far too slowly, but inevitably -- because more and more young people are perfectly aware that their friends are gay and there’s nothing wrong with that. Love is all too precious and rare -- no matter when and to whom we can give it and from whom receive it -- so any impediment to that, legal or social, needs to be identified and eradicated.
As soon as possible, and forever.
Meredith Baxter's New Family Ties: Shaun Hautly
Homosexuality is a topic which I take seriously. I went to a Christian high school and when one of my friends came out, a lot of his closest friends refused to talk to him. It broke my heart. He was the same guy he was the day before, and it really showed me that it's not a choice. That's my opinion. However, it seems like many times in the media, sexual orientation is utilized for publicity.
If an up-and-coming star is interviewed and asked about their sexuality, there's nothing wrong with that. However, as a 62 year old down-and-falling star goes on network television and proclaims this, there may be other motives at work. I didn't see the interview, so I don't know if it was a planted question or if she gave more information that was asked of her. Though, to put that kind of information in the spotlight, when you're not really on the radar, seems a bit desperate.
I'll say that I'm in no position to judge her or assume her motives, but if I'm being critical, I'll speculate that perhaps it was a case of being bisexual (62 years of men...) and wording it a bit more notably for the media. I'm not saying the subject is something anyone should ever hide, but it's not something you should walk around sharing. Let's keep intimacy and sexuality intimate. Keep people guessing. Everyone likes a little mystery.
Email Shaun
If an up-and-coming star is interviewed and asked about their sexuality, there's nothing wrong with that. However, as a 62 year old down-and-falling star goes on network television and proclaims this, there may be other motives at work. I didn't see the interview, so I don't know if it was a planted question or if she gave more information that was asked of her. Though, to put that kind of information in the spotlight, when you're not really on the radar, seems a bit desperate.
I'll say that I'm in no position to judge her or assume her motives, but if I'm being critical, I'll speculate that perhaps it was a case of being bisexual (62 years of men...) and wording it a bit more notably for the media. I'm not saying the subject is something anyone should ever hide, but it's not something you should walk around sharing. Let's keep intimacy and sexuality intimate. Keep people guessing. Everyone likes a little mystery.
Email Shaun
Meredith Baxter's New Family Ties: Austin Lee
An Open Letter from Meredith as Envisioned by Austin Lee:
Hi, my name is Meredith Baxter. I am a television actress, however, most of you have never heard of me. Since my last hit television show, Family Ties, ended over 20 years ago I have run out of money. I talked to a publicist and they recommended that I come out of the closet and declare to the world that I am a lesbian.
I was assured that a majority of people will support this decision and that it is very likely that many of the celebrity magazines will pay me to give interviews. I will probably get some bit parts in television shows and might even get to be on Larry King Live. I will also be asked to write an auto-biography now that I have something relevant going on in my life.
I know that the vast majority of gays and lesbians talk about knowing their sexual orientation from a very young age. That was not me. I decided to take this path when a lesbian (Ellen) got a syndicated daytime talk show and a multi-million dollar contract. The publicity from my announcement has already been overwhelming and I am excited about the future.
I'd like to thank my fan club for their support. Erma, Sally, and Thomas: You are the best fan club ever. All three of you hold a special place in my heart. (Although I do think its weird that you all have the same phone number and that when I call you my manager answers the phone.)
Available for Paid Interviews,
Meredith Baxter
PS. To my ex-husband who is still paying alimony: Too bad Californians didn’t vote for gay marriage. You are going to be paying for a really great house for me and Nancy! Thanks!
Email Austin
Hi, my name is Meredith Baxter. I am a television actress, however, most of you have never heard of me. Since my last hit television show, Family Ties, ended over 20 years ago I have run out of money. I talked to a publicist and they recommended that I come out of the closet and declare to the world that I am a lesbian.
I was assured that a majority of people will support this decision and that it is very likely that many of the celebrity magazines will pay me to give interviews. I will probably get some bit parts in television shows and might even get to be on Larry King Live. I will also be asked to write an auto-biography now that I have something relevant going on in my life.
I know that the vast majority of gays and lesbians talk about knowing their sexual orientation from a very young age. That was not me. I decided to take this path when a lesbian (Ellen) got a syndicated daytime talk show and a multi-million dollar contract. The publicity from my announcement has already been overwhelming and I am excited about the future.
I'd like to thank my fan club for their support. Erma, Sally, and Thomas: You are the best fan club ever. All three of you hold a special place in my heart. (Although I do think its weird that you all have the same phone number and that when I call you my manager answers the phone.)
Available for Paid Interviews,
Meredith Baxter
PS. To my ex-husband who is still paying alimony: Too bad Californians didn’t vote for gay marriage. You are going to be paying for a really great house for me and Nancy! Thanks!
Email Austin
Meredith Baxter's New Family Ties: Sasha Smith
I don't think anyone is obligated to proclaim their sexual preferences to the public. The only person who has the slight consideration to know is the love interest of the person. I would think they have the right to know the truth. Yet, I'm not a relationship expert so maybe I don't even have the right to do that. But sexuality is something that is black and white. We now have a spectrum and I am okay with that. My goal as a feminist is to help the rest of the world understand that much of our behavior is defined by these social norms that have been constructed for us since we were little girls and boys.
Poor Meredith has probably be struggling with her sexuality and trying to figure out what it meant to her, her new partner, and family never mind trying to explain to the whole world. When you or I have to make intimate life decisions, figuring out how to explain it to the rest of the world is not something we have to consider and neither should celebrities.
Now don't get me wrong. I'm the first one to pick up an In Touch magazine from the news stands and follow the celebrity gossip blogs for info on a weekly basis. Do I think Meredith will benefit career wise from this?... yes. Do I think that she will benefit from this personally?... no. I must say that whether you believe you can choose who you love or not, you definitely can choose your career. Deciding to be an actress, movie start or anyone famous leads you open to being judged, and ridiculed by the public. It's just something that comes with the job. In Ms. Baxter's business any news in the press is good news.
Email Sasha
Poor Meredith has probably be struggling with her sexuality and trying to figure out what it meant to her, her new partner, and family never mind trying to explain to the whole world. When you or I have to make intimate life decisions, figuring out how to explain it to the rest of the world is not something we have to consider and neither should celebrities.
Now don't get me wrong. I'm the first one to pick up an In Touch magazine from the news stands and follow the celebrity gossip blogs for info on a weekly basis. Do I think Meredith will benefit career wise from this?... yes. Do I think that she will benefit from this personally?... no. I must say that whether you believe you can choose who you love or not, you definitely can choose your career. Deciding to be an actress, movie start or anyone famous leads you open to being judged, and ridiculed by the public. It's just something that comes with the job. In Ms. Baxter's business any news in the press is good news.
Email Sasha
Meredith Baxter's New Family Ties: Ryan John
f you're like me, if someone told you Meredith Baxter was a lesbian, you'd probably give a confused look and ask some follow up questions. Like, who is that? Unless you saw her picture attached to an inciting headline as you searched your favorite news and entertainment website, you probably didn't remember that she was the mom from Family Ties. I have to admit that I think Family Ties is a timeless family comedy where Michael J. Fox plays Alex P. Keaton, one of the funniest television characters ever. But from that show, most people can only remember two names: Fox and Courtney Cox. Although Mallory's boyfriend Nick was pretty funny in his Neolithic ways, his impression on us pretty much stops with his long earring and leather jacket and his trademark one syllable responses.
Now lets imagine for a second that the actor Scott Valentine's role as Nick was successfully spun off and glorified on the television show, The Art of Being Nick and Scott Valentine had the opportunity to build a career on the tough guy, dense, motorcycle driving meat head image that was launched in Family Ties. Him announcing his homosexuality would be shocking and betraying to the general viewing public. But in reality, when Meredith Baxter announces she's a lesbian, it's nothing more than a human interest piece where people maybe curious enough to read her emotional struggles and the psychology behind her impossible male marriages. Realizing she was a lesbian and coming out of the closet was probably the most trying thing for this woman, as it is anyone who struggles with their sexuality. Personally for Meredith Baxter it could have been a roller coaster ride of confusion, resentment, anger, and embarrassment and whatever emotional turmoil that denied her sexual authenticity.
Baxter's perception as the understanding, ex-hippy mom with the All American blonde hair and blue eyes pretty much ended with the final episode of Family Ties in 1989. Although shes been somewhat active in the past twenty years doing TV movies, guest appearances and talk show hosts stints, the expression of her true sexuality this year can can give her the entertainment second wind she may want or need. Whether it's a Paris Hilton sex tape, Senator Larry Craig's solicitation of sex in a bathroom stall, Elliot Spitzer's affair with a call girl or superstar Tiger Woods admitted sexual affair with a cocktail waitress, or an ex-TV mom from a hit TV show twenty-five years ago, personal sexual actions are enough to get us talking .
Although a singer, songwriter and actor like Adam Lambert may take some heat from organizations like GLADD and may be shunned by some conservative television sets for his sexual inappropriateness, his success in the entertainment industry certainly wont be stunted. People aren't confusing Adam Lambert with the high school jock. But before the final contest of Idol was complete, Lambert had people wondering if he'd be the first "Gay Idol." His sexuality increased his notoriety and put him on the map from the beginning. Meredith Baxter's career may receive the resuscitation she needs in the second half of her entertainment life.
Now lets imagine for a second that the actor Scott Valentine's role as Nick was successfully spun off and glorified on the television show, The Art of Being Nick and Scott Valentine had the opportunity to build a career on the tough guy, dense, motorcycle driving meat head image that was launched in Family Ties. Him announcing his homosexuality would be shocking and betraying to the general viewing public. But in reality, when Meredith Baxter announces she's a lesbian, it's nothing more than a human interest piece where people maybe curious enough to read her emotional struggles and the psychology behind her impossible male marriages. Realizing she was a lesbian and coming out of the closet was probably the most trying thing for this woman, as it is anyone who struggles with their sexuality. Personally for Meredith Baxter it could have been a roller coaster ride of confusion, resentment, anger, and embarrassment and whatever emotional turmoil that denied her sexual authenticity.
Baxter's perception as the understanding, ex-hippy mom with the All American blonde hair and blue eyes pretty much ended with the final episode of Family Ties in 1989. Although shes been somewhat active in the past twenty years doing TV movies, guest appearances and talk show hosts stints, the expression of her true sexuality this year can can give her the entertainment second wind she may want or need. Whether it's a Paris Hilton sex tape, Senator Larry Craig's solicitation of sex in a bathroom stall, Elliot Spitzer's affair with a call girl or superstar Tiger Woods admitted sexual affair with a cocktail waitress, or an ex-TV mom from a hit TV show twenty-five years ago, personal sexual actions are enough to get us talking .
Although a singer, songwriter and actor like Adam Lambert may take some heat from organizations like GLADD and may be shunned by some conservative television sets for his sexual inappropriateness, his success in the entertainment industry certainly wont be stunted. People aren't confusing Adam Lambert with the high school jock. But before the final contest of Idol was complete, Lambert had people wondering if he'd be the first "Gay Idol." His sexuality increased his notoriety and put him on the map from the beginning. Meredith Baxter's career may receive the resuscitation she needs in the second half of her entertainment life.
Meredith Baxter's New Family Ties: Have Your Say
Now that you've read what our panel thought on this subject, have your say by leaving a comment.
Faith In America Part Two: How and Why We Pray by Jeff Weiss
This is the second in a series of articles about faith in America.
A recent poll conducted by Parade magazine asked “how spiritual are we?” The results showed that many of the people polled considered themselves religious (45%), and also considered themselves better off with religion as opposed to without it (53%). The majority believe in God (69%) but more said they rarely attend services (30% compared with 27% who attend weekly). While most say they pray for the well-being of others (72%), 51% pray for money or a better job.
I pray every day. I usually don't ask for anything in particular; mostly my prayers are to worship God, not ask for favors. If someone is sick or going through a hard time I will pray for their intentions, but I try not to “bargain' with God through prayers. I think that defeats the purpose of “Thy will be done.”
My favorite prayer, and one that I pray daily, is actually a series of devotional prayers known as the Rosary. For those who don't know what the Rosary is, it is a set of prayer beads, with each bead representing a prayer. The prayers consist of five decades (or repeated sequences) of the “Our Father” (The Lord's Prayer), “Hail Mary”, and “Glory Be to the Father.” Praying the Rosary is dedicated to one of four sets of "Mysteries" said in sequence each day. The Mysteries consist of the Joyful Mysteries; the Sorrowful Mysteries; the Glorious Mysteries, and the Luminous Mysteries. Each set of Mysteries has within it five different themes to be meditated upon while saying each decade of Hail Marys. I know it sounds complicated, but it's not. I always know which day of the week corresponds with each Mystery, and the order of themes within each Mystery.
While I don't think it's my place to tell people what to believe in or how to worship, I know that personally I am very happy attending Catholic Mass every week (and I try to attend daily Mass as often as possible). I couldn't imagine a day without praying or reading from the Bible.
Thursday, December 3, 2009
Obama's New War Plan
Today Art, Shaun, Jamie, and Sasha state their opinions on the President's action plan for Afghanistan. After you read their thoughts, share your viewpoint by leaving a comment.
Obama's New War Plan: David Loftus
I was opposed to going to war in Afghanistan and Iraq from the start because I felt they would be a waste of time, money, and above all, human lives. I haven't seen anything to persuade me otherwise. The only thing certain to come out of this "new" plan will be higher casualty figures. There is no guarantee that anyone at all will ultimately benefit, and a lot more people will suffer and die.
I should say that I have nothing in particular against Obama, who apparently is trying to make the best of an awful situation that was handed to him. My disgust is reserved for all the people who fell for the same old patriotic hooey and thought this war would turn out any different from all the other typical foreign incursions, from Cuba and the Philippines to Vietnam -- and that would be most of Congress and you, my fellow Americans. Even if anything resembling "democracy" were to result in Afghanistan (and I predict it won't; because if a majority of the people don't rise up and take control of a country on their own, then they're never going to be able to rule themselves after a foreign power has come in and done the heavy lifting), is anyone really prepared to say all the thousands of Afghan and American lives lost were worth it? I bet there'll be a lot of people over there who'll say it's not.
Once again, this brings to mind the comment by the Austrian journalist Karl Kraus (1874-1936): "War is, at first, the hope that one will be better off; next, the expectation that the other fellow will be worse off; then, the satisfaction that he isn't any better off; and, finally, the surprise at everyone's being worse off."
I should say that I have nothing in particular against Obama, who apparently is trying to make the best of an awful situation that was handed to him. My disgust is reserved for all the people who fell for the same old patriotic hooey and thought this war would turn out any different from all the other typical foreign incursions, from Cuba and the Philippines to Vietnam -- and that would be most of Congress and you, my fellow Americans. Even if anything resembling "democracy" were to result in Afghanistan (and I predict it won't; because if a majority of the people don't rise up and take control of a country on their own, then they're never going to be able to rule themselves after a foreign power has come in and done the heavy lifting), is anyone really prepared to say all the thousands of Afghan and American lives lost were worth it? I bet there'll be a lot of people over there who'll say it's not.
Once again, this brings to mind the comment by the Austrian journalist Karl Kraus (1874-1936): "War is, at first, the hope that one will be better off; next, the expectation that the other fellow will be worse off; then, the satisfaction that he isn't any better off; and, finally, the surprise at everyone's being worse off."
Obama's New War Plan: Shaun Hautly
So more troops are going to Afghanistan. Not quite what we had hoped for this presidential term. Then again, when we elected Bush, we weren't hoping for it either. Part of being president is making tough decisions and being the figure head for decisions that others make. Maybe it's not Obama's wish to send the troops, but he trusts his secretary of defense, and other military leaders who say this is the best move. One last push. Like tearing off a band-aid.
It's very easy to look at this decision and say horrible things about Obama. The democrats get to say that sending troops in is a horrible idea, and the republicans get to say that he lied. However, how many Americans will do the research and find out exactly why and exactly what's going on in Afghanistan. Granted, not ALL that information is shared with the general public, but then again that general public doesn't ever really care to find out. They hear something and base their judgments off that.
I guess I just grow tired of political critiques, because they're always the same. Nothing makes everyone happy and we just need to either accept that and move on, or change our point of view to understand that as a bipartisan system, we win some, we lose some, but our children are still in school, there's roofs over most heads, and soon we all may even have health-care. Things aren't as bad as they seem. My heart goes out to the families of the 30,000 troops, and we thank them for their service. Hopefully this will be the last big push, but let's not act surprised when it's not.
Email Shaun
It's very easy to look at this decision and say horrible things about Obama. The democrats get to say that sending troops in is a horrible idea, and the republicans get to say that he lied. However, how many Americans will do the research and find out exactly why and exactly what's going on in Afghanistan. Granted, not ALL that information is shared with the general public, but then again that general public doesn't ever really care to find out. They hear something and base their judgments off that.
I guess I just grow tired of political critiques, because they're always the same. Nothing makes everyone happy and we just need to either accept that and move on, or change our point of view to understand that as a bipartisan system, we win some, we lose some, but our children are still in school, there's roofs over most heads, and soon we all may even have health-care. Things aren't as bad as they seem. My heart goes out to the families of the 30,000 troops, and we thank them for their service. Hopefully this will be the last big push, but let's not act surprised when it's not.
Email Shaun
Obama's New War Plan: Jamie Metrick
My feelings on the Afghani deployment are also mixed. At this point, I don't think anyone wants more war, more debt, and more American lives lost. But are Obama supporters really so naive as to think once he became president he would magically find a way to subdue the Taliban and Al'Qaeda and everyone would come home? And in his first year no less? President Obama has chosen a plan of action that is only the first step in stabilizing Afghanistan. He may not be the idealist Czar of change he campaigned as, but he is a pragmatist. I can't help but feel that by being a target of criticism of both the far right and the far left his political strategy is well-advised and balanced.
I think we all must prepare ourselves for the long-haul. We are trying to simultaneously restore two war-torn nations and defeat several international terrorist organizations. These conflicts may not be resolved even after two Obama terms. We had a chance to stabilize Afghanistan in the 1980s and - as anyone who has read Charlie Wilson's War can tell you - we blew it. We have been dealing with those ramifications ever since and may have to for years to come. I fear that anything this and future administrations do will be futile, but only time will tell.
However, I do wish that Obama would learn a lesson from the Reagan administration and instead of spending billions on the military, use some of that money to build schools, hospitals, and other infrastructure in Afghanistan. We have tried bullets and bombs. I think it is time to try education and economic growth. It will not yield instant, drastic results but it will lay the foundation for real and long lasting change in Afghanistan.
Email Jamie
I think we all must prepare ourselves for the long-haul. We are trying to simultaneously restore two war-torn nations and defeat several international terrorist organizations. These conflicts may not be resolved even after two Obama terms. We had a chance to stabilize Afghanistan in the 1980s and - as anyone who has read Charlie Wilson's War can tell you - we blew it. We have been dealing with those ramifications ever since and may have to for years to come. I fear that anything this and future administrations do will be futile, but only time will tell.
However, I do wish that Obama would learn a lesson from the Reagan administration and instead of spending billions on the military, use some of that money to build schools, hospitals, and other infrastructure in Afghanistan. We have tried bullets and bombs. I think it is time to try education and economic growth. It will not yield instant, drastic results but it will lay the foundation for real and long lasting change in Afghanistan.
Email Jamie
Obama's New War Plan: Sasha Smith
I think this must have been one of the hardest messages for Obama to do. I know he probably had to make a really hard decision. I'm not also sure that I can say I wouldn't have made the same decision. As much as I am anti-war, we can't ignore the fact that Obama did not start the war and we had been entrenched in this awful situation years before he became President.
I'm not sure that it would really be responsible for us to have started a war and then pulled out and leave the people that we destroyed helpless. Obama most likely would not have started an unnecessary war but unfortunately he is going to be the one who is remembered having to end it.
I am not in the White House to know the in's and out's on how Obama came to that decision. We probably will never know the truth and will be speculating until all the troops come home. The hardest part of the decision for me is the $30 billion dollars in the first year alone. Today, I was facilitating race dialogues at Morehouse College, an historically black college in Atlanta, for Abraham Lincoln's Bicentennial Leadership Town Hall's (which are being held all across the nation.) We talked about Lincoln's "unfinished work." This was referring to race and equal rights for all as two major challenges for Lincoln that we still struggle with today. Obama is part of this "unfinished work." And he alone will not be able to finish it. We will have to help our President and our nation to overcome the hate an that started this unnecessary war in the first place. Lincoln is researched, and written about in the same amount of times as Jesus, and Shakespeare. If a man so great was able to make mistakes and still be revered as one of Americans best President's than I believe Obama has the right to learn from his decision and maybe some day we will be revering him in the same way as Lincoln. If I learned anything today from being in a room with high powered leadership in the city of Atlanta it was that we should not judge someone by a few decisions they have made but by how they have learned and grown to be a better man from those decisions.
(To learn more about Lincoln's Bicentennial Celebration events visit www.lincolnbicentennial.gov.)
Email Sasha
I'm not sure that it would really be responsible for us to have started a war and then pulled out and leave the people that we destroyed helpless. Obama most likely would not have started an unnecessary war but unfortunately he is going to be the one who is remembered having to end it.
I am not in the White House to know the in's and out's on how Obama came to that decision. We probably will never know the truth and will be speculating until all the troops come home. The hardest part of the decision for me is the $30 billion dollars in the first year alone. Today, I was facilitating race dialogues at Morehouse College, an historically black college in Atlanta, for Abraham Lincoln's Bicentennial Leadership Town Hall's (which are being held all across the nation.) We talked about Lincoln's "unfinished work." This was referring to race and equal rights for all as two major challenges for Lincoln that we still struggle with today. Obama is part of this "unfinished work." And he alone will not be able to finish it. We will have to help our President and our nation to overcome the hate an that started this unnecessary war in the first place. Lincoln is researched, and written about in the same amount of times as Jesus, and Shakespeare. If a man so great was able to make mistakes and still be revered as one of Americans best President's than I believe Obama has the right to learn from his decision and maybe some day we will be revering him in the same way as Lincoln. If I learned anything today from being in a room with high powered leadership in the city of Atlanta it was that we should not judge someone by a few decisions they have made but by how they have learned and grown to be a better man from those decisions.
(To learn more about Lincoln's Bicentennial Celebration events visit www.lincolnbicentennial.gov.)
Email Sasha
Obama's New War Plan: Have Your Say
Now that you've read what our panel thought on this subject, have your say by leaving a comment.
Wednesday, December 2, 2009
The Curious Case of Tiger Woods
Since then, a maelstrom of media coverage has developed: Was Tiger drunk? Was he in a fight with his wife? Is he cheating on her? And on and on. Do you think the media is being fair in it's coverage of Tiger Woods' car accident? Today David, Scott, and Austin discuss why we as Americans love to hear about celebrity scandals – even when the scandal is a minor as a fender bender. After you read their opinions, have your say by leaving a comment.
UPDATE: Tiger Woods responded today to recent allegations:
"I have let my family down and I regret those transgressions with all of my heart. I have not been true to my values and the behavior my family deserves. I am not without faults and I am far short of perfect. I am dealing with my behavior and personal failings behind closed doors with my family. Those feelings should be shared by us alone."
The full statement is available on tigerwoods.com.
The Curious Case of Tiger Woods: David Loftus
I’m eager to write about this, but I’m also annoyed. I’m eager to write about it because I’m annoyed. I’m not annoyed by the behavior of Mr. and Mrs. Woods -- it’s none of my business, really -- but by the sustained noise about their misadventure in the news media. To make a proper comment on the event, I’d have to explore the coverage further, and I don’t wish to participate in the circus by doing that, so I’m going to indulge in some uninformed opinionation.
It appears that most if not all of this frolic took place on private property -- that belonging to the Woods and to their neighbor -- and not on a public thoroughfare. Such being the case, I’m sure both parties would have been happy to settle any damages quietly between them. I seem to recall that one of the early stories I could not avoid said that Mr. Woods is not obligated to talk to the police. Why are they requesting him to come in, then? Possibly he might have posed a threat to public safety if he had managed to drive onto a city street, but apparently he didn’t get that far -- whether due to emotional upset or intoxication, I don’t see it is necessary for us to know.
Why is this incident getting so much attention? Because Tiger Woods is an admired athlete-celebrity, and we always resent those whom we admire. We resent the fact that other people are more beautiful than we, more talented than we, wealthier than we, get more attention than we, and are just plain better than we are by almost any conceivable measure, so we need to tear them down as well as admire them. And we ought to be ashamed of the fact that we do. Just because a person is famous for other reasons does not mean every little incident in his life is newsworthy: I would be outraged if the press poked into my private life this way and I refuse to participate in the humiliation of the Woods family now. It irritates me no end that in order to purchase my necessary groceries I am forced to walk past half a dozen magazine covers that trumpet the weaknesses and misbehavior of people I don’t know and about whom I could not care less. I suppose the fact that snooty, elitist, overpriced über-markets such as New Seasons and Whole Foods don’t display such magazines at the check-stand is one of their undisputed virtues and another justification for their prices (although their checkout fare continues to value youth, athleticism, and clear skin over wisdom and kindness). Let the rest of the nation play this game. I will not.
It appears that most if not all of this frolic took place on private property -- that belonging to the Woods and to their neighbor -- and not on a public thoroughfare. Such being the case, I’m sure both parties would have been happy to settle any damages quietly between them. I seem to recall that one of the early stories I could not avoid said that Mr. Woods is not obligated to talk to the police. Why are they requesting him to come in, then? Possibly he might have posed a threat to public safety if he had managed to drive onto a city street, but apparently he didn’t get that far -- whether due to emotional upset or intoxication, I don’t see it is necessary for us to know.
Why is this incident getting so much attention? Because Tiger Woods is an admired athlete-celebrity, and we always resent those whom we admire. We resent the fact that other people are more beautiful than we, more talented than we, wealthier than we, get more attention than we, and are just plain better than we are by almost any conceivable measure, so we need to tear them down as well as admire them. And we ought to be ashamed of the fact that we do. Just because a person is famous for other reasons does not mean every little incident in his life is newsworthy: I would be outraged if the press poked into my private life this way and I refuse to participate in the humiliation of the Woods family now. It irritates me no end that in order to purchase my necessary groceries I am forced to walk past half a dozen magazine covers that trumpet the weaknesses and misbehavior of people I don’t know and about whom I could not care less. I suppose the fact that snooty, elitist, overpriced über-markets such as New Seasons and Whole Foods don’t display such magazines at the check-stand is one of their undisputed virtues and another justification for their prices (although their checkout fare continues to value youth, athleticism, and clear skin over wisdom and kindness). Let the rest of the nation play this game. I will not.
The Curious Case of Tiger Woods: Scott Hinkley
I am sad for Tiger Woods that his toe has slipped off the pedestal, but I don't worry for his fate, because the crowd loves a fallen hero the most. I can't say that I blame those blaring his story across global-news-media either. He is paid to be watched, and the rule of celebrity is that if your are watched at all, you can be watched all the time. I think he behaved wisely by staying out of the lights and letting reporters brew their rumors, but I am fairly certain he will have to say something publicly at some point, just to settle things down again.
I think the reason Americans, and people around the world, enjoy celebrity dirt is because we want to be close with them, and flaws make them human again. I think the more weighty emotions people deal with regarding celebrity are feelings of envy, jealousy and discouragement. I am not trying to say that people seek these negative feelings when they admire someone, but after an extended period, it seems to me that these deeper, more menacing feelings come out. It is at this point that I would say a celebrity's public is hungry for failure and flaw. In Tiger's case, he seems to live a carefree life with a beautiful family, plenty of money, and recognition everywhere he goes. Now that there is a taste of drama, his public seems to be learning what they might have in common with their idol. The irony is that now some of his biggest fans are rooting for him to reveal failure, just to feel a bit closer to the man.
Email Scott
I think the reason Americans, and people around the world, enjoy celebrity dirt is because we want to be close with them, and flaws make them human again. I think the more weighty emotions people deal with regarding celebrity are feelings of envy, jealousy and discouragement. I am not trying to say that people seek these negative feelings when they admire someone, but after an extended period, it seems to me that these deeper, more menacing feelings come out. It is at this point that I would say a celebrity's public is hungry for failure and flaw. In Tiger's case, he seems to live a carefree life with a beautiful family, plenty of money, and recognition everywhere he goes. Now that there is a taste of drama, his public seems to be learning what they might have in common with their idol. The irony is that now some of his biggest fans are rooting for him to reveal failure, just to feel a bit closer to the man.
Email Scott
The Curious Case of Tiger Woods: Austin Lee
When I was little, my world revolved around Sesame Street. I would watch every afternoon as Big Bird, Oscar the Grouch, Elmo, Bert, Ernie, and the other characters would teach me letters, numbers, how to count, and how to share. Some of the songs I learned over 20 years ago still stick in my head.
One of those songs was sung by Cookie Monster. Cookie Monster, a big blue furry puppet with a fondness for cookies, would have a group of four items on his plate and would sing, “One of these things is not like the others, one of these things doesn’t belong.”
So, let’s play the Cookie Monster game together, (With sincere apologies to Jim Henson.):
* John F. Kennedy was assassinated on November 22, 1963.
* Martin Luther King, Jr. was assassinated on April 4, 1968.
* Robert F. Kennedy was assassinated on June 6, 1968.
* Tiger Woods was in a minor car accident in his driveway on November 27, 2009.
Obviously, the media coverage of the first three events was monumental, and rightly so. These were important political figures that helped to change our nation and shaped the way we approach our fellow man. Questions over the who, what, when, where, and why swirled in the news for days and in one case people still wonder what really happened on the grassy knoll.
Somehow the media has lost its way in terms of reporting what is really important. Each day men and women die in Darfur from genocide, Afghanistan and Iraq from war, and across the world children are sold into sexual slavery. With all of this happening, the media decides that the most important thing to cover is a fender bender in a gated community in Florida.
Someone needs to tell the news media to watch a few episodes of Sesame Street so they can get back to work on the things that matter.
Email Austin
One of those songs was sung by Cookie Monster. Cookie Monster, a big blue furry puppet with a fondness for cookies, would have a group of four items on his plate and would sing, “One of these things is not like the others, one of these things doesn’t belong.”
So, let’s play the Cookie Monster game together, (With sincere apologies to Jim Henson.):
* John F. Kennedy was assassinated on November 22, 1963.
* Martin Luther King, Jr. was assassinated on April 4, 1968.
* Robert F. Kennedy was assassinated on June 6, 1968.
* Tiger Woods was in a minor car accident in his driveway on November 27, 2009.
Obviously, the media coverage of the first three events was monumental, and rightly so. These were important political figures that helped to change our nation and shaped the way we approach our fellow man. Questions over the who, what, when, where, and why swirled in the news for days and in one case people still wonder what really happened on the grassy knoll.
Somehow the media has lost its way in terms of reporting what is really important. Each day men and women die in Darfur from genocide, Afghanistan and Iraq from war, and across the world children are sold into sexual slavery. With all of this happening, the media decides that the most important thing to cover is a fender bender in a gated community in Florida.
Someone needs to tell the news media to watch a few episodes of Sesame Street so they can get back to work on the things that matter.
Email Austin
The Curious Case of Tiger Woods: Have Your Say
Now that you've read what our panel thought on this subject, have your say by leaving a comment.
Tuesday, December 1, 2009
World AIDS Day
Today, Art, Scott, Jamie, and Sasha share with us their thoughts on the AIDS crisis and World AIDS Day. After reading what they share with us today, please join the conversation by leaving a comment.
World AIDS Day: David Loftus
Since its heyday as the “epidemic” of the late 1980s and early 1990s, it’s amazing how far AIDS has receded from awareness -- mine as much as anyone’s. I was a reporter on the medical beat of a small Western newspaper when the great white hetero powers-that-be finally began to admit that it wasn’t just a “gay problem.” I got myself tested for HIV (and photographed having my blood drawn) so I could explain the procedure to readers. There wasn’t much point in doing so for myself, since I had had few partners by then, and had mostly practiced safer sex, even in my teens. Some years later I was tested again when there was more cause for concern, and tested negative again.
I’ve lost a few acquaintances to AIDS over the years -- a fellow I acted with on stage, other friends of friends -- but no one really dear to me. I heard that a high school classmate contracted HIV from her philandering husband, who subsequently died of AIDS; I never knew her well, and there wasn’t anything to say to her, really, when we happened to cross trails at a reunion, but I hope she’s still going strong. Colleagues and I do staged readings of “A Christmas Carol” every December at the local AIDS Hospice, but it’s just another stop among half a dozen nursing homes and retirement centers. And I can hardly remember reading a substantive story on HIV in a decade. Probably thousands are dying every day of AIDS in Africa and Asia, but I never hear about them. I’m sure somebody’s doing an awareness event here in Portland for World AIDS day, but I don’t know what it is, and am more concerned about an audition I have this afternoon.
Sometimes I think we should be obligated to listen to a summation of world news every day: emphasis on “world” (not just the U.S.) as well as “news” (not the latest crap about the some LA pseudo-celeb, or a movie or TV series the station is trying to plug with a bogus “inside look”). Sort of like homework for grownups. Not a lot … five minutes a day would do. Just to remind us there is a much bigger world of pain, hunger, disease, violence, and neglect outside our exoskeleton homes and gated homeland.
I’ve lost a few acquaintances to AIDS over the years -- a fellow I acted with on stage, other friends of friends -- but no one really dear to me. I heard that a high school classmate contracted HIV from her philandering husband, who subsequently died of AIDS; I never knew her well, and there wasn’t anything to say to her, really, when we happened to cross trails at a reunion, but I hope she’s still going strong. Colleagues and I do staged readings of “A Christmas Carol” every December at the local AIDS Hospice, but it’s just another stop among half a dozen nursing homes and retirement centers. And I can hardly remember reading a substantive story on HIV in a decade. Probably thousands are dying every day of AIDS in Africa and Asia, but I never hear about them. I’m sure somebody’s doing an awareness event here in Portland for World AIDS day, but I don’t know what it is, and am more concerned about an audition I have this afternoon.
Sometimes I think we should be obligated to listen to a summation of world news every day: emphasis on “world” (not just the U.S.) as well as “news” (not the latest crap about the some LA pseudo-celeb, or a movie or TV series the station is trying to plug with a bogus “inside look”). Sort of like homework for grownups. Not a lot … five minutes a day would do. Just to remind us there is a much bigger world of pain, hunger, disease, violence, and neglect outside our exoskeleton homes and gated homeland.
World AIDS Day: Scott Hinkley
No year has World AIDS day been more significant. As America sits at attention as the fate of collective heath insurance is hashed out on the senate floor, larger questions about moral implications related to health-problems are lurking at every corner. It seems to me that, more than ever, we need to maintain a strong public image about our efforts to fight AIDS. When we talk of diseases which plague our planet, AIDS is one of the biggest killers, and yet the methods by which it is contracted mire the actual problem in social and personal judgments about the behavior of those who suffer from AIDS, or it's initial infectious state, HIV.
I feel it is of paramount importance that we begin to address the social stigmas which are still attached to the idea of STDs, especially when the stakes of infection are so high. I hope that as we continue to try and raise money and awareness, that we can also try to work ourselves away from the embarrassment we project onto all topics of a sexual nature, so that we can actually discuss the real threats and means of curtailing the spread of HIV and AIDS. We have come a long way in the discussions of condoms and other contraceptives, but there is still an overall interest in many to conceal the details of sexual interaction, and I am fairly certain that this will leave a large enough undereducated group to maintain the level of epidemic for many years to come. Give money, give time, but most of all, give knowledge and preach understanding.
Email Scott
I feel it is of paramount importance that we begin to address the social stigmas which are still attached to the idea of STDs, especially when the stakes of infection are so high. I hope that as we continue to try and raise money and awareness, that we can also try to work ourselves away from the embarrassment we project onto all topics of a sexual nature, so that we can actually discuss the real threats and means of curtailing the spread of HIV and AIDS. We have come a long way in the discussions of condoms and other contraceptives, but there is still an overall interest in many to conceal the details of sexual interaction, and I am fairly certain that this will leave a large enough undereducated group to maintain the level of epidemic for many years to come. Give money, give time, but most of all, give knowledge and preach understanding.
Email Scott
World AIDS Day: Jamie Metrick
Personally, I have not had my own life affected by HIV/AIDS nor has anyone close to me. But it doesn't matter. AIDS effects everyone, be it our government policies or health care or how we conduct our sex lives. We all must take precautions and be aware that this awful disease does not discriminate who it infects. Unfortunately, HIV positive people do face discrimination. Only 20 or so years ago during the peak of the Gay and Lesbian community's AIDS epidemic there was talk by our legislators of segregating and/or quarantining all homosexuals, even requiring them to wear badges or patches identifying themselves as infected. Today du jour discrimination against HIV/AIDS is illegal, but fear and ignorance still allow de facto bias to continue.
So for this year's World AIDS Day, and for all your days to come, if a HIV positive person chooses to disclose to you their status please give them the courtesy and respect they deserve. Even well-meaning people can panic if someone discloses, especially a potential sexual partner. If a sexual partner is positive and tells you up front, you have the right to say no if you are uncomfortable. But know that many HIV negative people are in long-term and serious relationships with HIV positive people. Whatever you choose remember it takes a lot of courage to disclose this information. Besides, there are many people who do know they are positive and choose not to reveal their status, potentially putting other people at risk.
And as always, if you are sexually active use protection and get regular tests for STIs. AIDS isn't the death sentence it once was, but there are people around the world and here at home who do not have access to effective treatments. There are wonderful AIDS-related charities such as AmFAR, World Vision, and UNICEF always looking for donations! If you have recently discovered you are HIV positive you can go to Project Inform for information, advocacy and support at www.projinf.org.
Email Jamie
So for this year's World AIDS Day, and for all your days to come, if a HIV positive person chooses to disclose to you their status please give them the courtesy and respect they deserve. Even well-meaning people can panic if someone discloses, especially a potential sexual partner. If a sexual partner is positive and tells you up front, you have the right to say no if you are uncomfortable. But know that many HIV negative people are in long-term and serious relationships with HIV positive people. Whatever you choose remember it takes a lot of courage to disclose this information. Besides, there are many people who do know they are positive and choose not to reveal their status, potentially putting other people at risk.
And as always, if you are sexually active use protection and get regular tests for STIs. AIDS isn't the death sentence it once was, but there are people around the world and here at home who do not have access to effective treatments. There are wonderful AIDS-related charities such as AmFAR, World Vision, and UNICEF always looking for donations! If you have recently discovered you are HIV positive you can go to Project Inform for information, advocacy and support at www.projinf.org.
Email Jamie
World AIDS Day: Sasha Smith
Atlanta recently had our annual Aids Walk at Piedmont Park (our equivalent of Central Park) in October 2009. It was a beautiful fall day and hundreds of people were out to support the cause. One of the many AIDS Awareness events there was a huge AIDS quilt. I was with a friend who pointed out that most of the quilts had dates that were marked in the 1990's. We had a long discussion about why that is. I viewed it as positive thing. My friend Sarah and I discussed why we thought we didn't see too many 2000's. Our conclusion was people were surviving longer and less people dying in mass quantities in the United States, or our country has become immune to the AIDS discussion and we just didn't talk about it as much anymore. I'm not sure what the statistics are from the 80's of people dying from AIDS but I do know they definitely weren't living as long as people are living now.
My partner and I were just discussing Magic Johnson last week. He is the ultimate poster child for surviving and living a healthy life with AIDS (as well as the character of Robin Scorpio on my favorite soap opera, General Hospital.) My major point of concern for the AIDS epidemic is the rest of the world. A young woman blogger like myself in the Congo is probably not able to say the same things about the progress of medicine and people living with AIDS. Our health and science technology for saving lives is much more advanced than most countries and is not spreading quick enough to the rest of the undeveloped world. This past Sunday on Meet the Press, Bill and Melinda Gates were talking about this same issue. They discussed the need for science and technology to spread to the rest of the world to help fight disease. One of The Gates Family Foundation guiding principles is that science and technology can help save lives around the world. They claimed that they are committed to their philanthropy efforts on educating folks in the health science field. Their hope is that new scientists will spread all over the continents to save lives.
AIDS is devastating disease that has a lot of controversial history. At this point, we need to move forward and make sure that we are not losing more people to AIDS and not just in the US. We do really need to consider the theme of "Universal Access and Human Rights." Can we really say that we are making a true commitment to those all over the world? When we start talking about giving access to treatment and care to those more privileged and not allowing access to the less privileges this is definitely a human rights issue.
I'm proud to live in the city of Atlanta, where the annual Interfaith Prayer Breakfast features a keynote address by Kenneth R. Overberg from Xavier University in Cincinnati. Events in the city will range from free AIDS testing to poetry and honoring the one's that have been lost. It will be a good day of education and remembrance.
Email Sasha
My partner and I were just discussing Magic Johnson last week. He is the ultimate poster child for surviving and living a healthy life with AIDS (as well as the character of Robin Scorpio on my favorite soap opera, General Hospital.) My major point of concern for the AIDS epidemic is the rest of the world. A young woman blogger like myself in the Congo is probably not able to say the same things about the progress of medicine and people living with AIDS. Our health and science technology for saving lives is much more advanced than most countries and is not spreading quick enough to the rest of the undeveloped world. This past Sunday on Meet the Press, Bill and Melinda Gates were talking about this same issue. They discussed the need for science and technology to spread to the rest of the world to help fight disease. One of The Gates Family Foundation guiding principles is that science and technology can help save lives around the world. They claimed that they are committed to their philanthropy efforts on educating folks in the health science field. Their hope is that new scientists will spread all over the continents to save lives.
AIDS is devastating disease that has a lot of controversial history. At this point, we need to move forward and make sure that we are not losing more people to AIDS and not just in the US. We do really need to consider the theme of "Universal Access and Human Rights." Can we really say that we are making a true commitment to those all over the world? When we start talking about giving access to treatment and care to those more privileged and not allowing access to the less privileges this is definitely a human rights issue.
I'm proud to live in the city of Atlanta, where the annual Interfaith Prayer Breakfast features a keynote address by Kenneth R. Overberg from Xavier University in Cincinnati. Events in the city will range from free AIDS testing to poetry and honoring the one's that have been lost. It will be a good day of education and remembrance.
Email Sasha
World AIDS Day: Have Your Say
Now that you've read what our panel thought on this subject, have your say by leaving a comment.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
Posts
